People v. Gales
| Decision Date | 16 November 1992 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Lester GALES, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Peter Branti, Jr., New City (Clare McCue Cincotta, of counsel; Derek A. Popeil, on the brief), for appellant.
Kenneth Gribetz, Dist. Atty., New City (Deborah Wolikow Loewenberg, of counsel), for respondent.
Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and ROSENBLATT, MILLER and RITTER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered January 30, 1991, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Officer Edward Chorba testified that he stopped the vehicle in which the defendant was a passenger because he recognized its distinctive vanity license plates and knew the operator had been issued a summons for driving with a suspended license approximately one week earlier. Under the circumstances, the officer had reasonable suspicion that the driver was operating the vehicle in violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law ( cf., People v. Ingle, 36 N.Y.2d 413, 369 N.Y.S.2d 67, 330 N.E.2d 39). There is no basis for concluding, as the defendant argues, that the officers stopped the vehicle for the suspected traffic violation as a mere pretext to investigate unrelated criminal activity ( see, People v. Pincus, 184 A.D.2d 666, 584 N.Y.S.2d 866; People v. Solano, 179 A.D.2d 791, 578 N.Y.S.2d 647; People v. Williams, 137 A.D.2d 569, 524 N.Y.S.2d 309). The record also supports the suppression court's finding that one of the police officers observed what appeared to be the handle of a gun protruding from the rear pocket of the defendant's pants after he had exited the car. This justified the pat-down of the defendant and the recovery of the gun and drugs from his person ( see, People v. Rose, 159 A.D.2d 600, 552 N.Y.S.2d 459). Accordingly, the motion to suppress the physical evidence was properly denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Hinshaw
...609 N.Y.S.2d 257 [2d Dept. 1994] ; People v. Smith, 197 A.D.2d 860, 860, 602 N.Y.S.2d 279 [4th Dept. 1993] ; People v. Gales, 187 A.D.2d 606, 606, 590 N.Y.S.2d 105 [2d Dept. 1992] ; People v. Benbow, 170 A.D.2d 456, 456, 565 N.Y.S.2d 545 [2d Dept. 1991] ; People v. Ceballos, 175 A.D.2d 315,......
-
People v. Blalark
...35 A.D.3d 1212, 1212, 825 N.Y.S.2d 627 [2006], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 946, 836 N.Y.S.2d 557, 868 N.E.2d 240 [2007] ; People v. Gales, 187 A.D.2d 606, 606, 590 N.Y.S.2d 105 [1992], lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 788, 594 N.Y.S.2d 735, 610 N.E.2d 408 [1993] ). Defendant's contention that Supreme Court abu......
-
People v. Riggio
...the defendant was operating his vehicle without a valid license in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 510 (see, People v. Gales, 187 A.D.2d 606, 590 N.Y.S.2d 105). The police officer's testimony concerning these two grounds was wholly credited by the hearing court and there exists no ba......
-
People v. Antelmi
...the vehicle in which the defendant was a passenger was properly stopped by the police for a traffic violation (see, People v. Gales, 187 A.D.2d 606, 590 N.Y.S.2d 105; People v. Brunson, 166 A.D.2d 204, 564 N.Y.S.2d 100). However, the police thereafter forcibly detained and searched the defe......