People v. Galloway

Decision Date16 April 2009
Docket Number338.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BLAINE GALLOWAY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The court properly permitted the prosecutor to elicit evidence that 10 months before the charged crimes defendant punched the victim, his girlfriend, over a perceived infidelity. The evidence constituted highly probative background information that tended to explain the relationship between defendant and the victim (see People v Dorm, 12 NY3d 16 [2009]). This evidence also placed the victim's testimony in a believable context and tended to refute defendant's defense (see People v Steinberg, 170 AD2d 50, 72-74 [1991], affd 79 NY2d 673 [1992]). Defendant's remaining arguments concerning this evidence are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits.

The court's Sandoval ruling, permitting only limited inquiry into defendant's extensive record, balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203 [2002]; People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]).

Defendant's generalized objections did not preserve his challenges to the prosecutor's summation comments (see People v Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879 [1994]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits (see People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 976 [1998]; People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]).

Concur — GONZALEZ, P.J., NARDELLI, CATTERSON, MOSKOWITZ and RENWICK, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Larkins
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 May 2015
    ...People v. Duperroy, 88 A.D.3d 606, 607, 931 N.Y.S.2d 70, lv. denied 18 N.Y.3d 957, 944 N.Y.S.2d 485, 967 N.E.2d 710 ; People v. Galloway, 61 A.D.3d 520, 520–521, 876 N.Y.S.2d 406, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 915, 884 N.Y.S.2d 696, 912 N.E.2d 1077 ). “It is fundamental that evidence of uncharged cr......
  • People v. Holmes
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 March 2013
    ...263;People v. Duperroy, 88 A.D.3d 606, 607, 931 N.Y.S.2d 70,lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 957, 944 N.Y.S.2d 485, 967 N.E.2d 710;People v. Galloway, 61 A.D.3d 520, 520–521, 876 N.Y.S.2d 406,lv. denied12 N.Y.3d 915, 884 N.Y.S.2d 696, 912 N.E.2d 1077). We note in any event that the court's limiting inst......
  • People v. Galloway
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 15 June 2009
    ...N.E.2d 1077 12 N.Y.3d 915 PEOPLE v. GALLOWAY. Court of Appeals of New York. June 15, 2009. Appeal from 1st Dept.: 61 A.D.3d 520, 876 N.Y.S.2d 406 (NY). Application for leave to Criminal Appeal Denied. (Lippman, ...
  • Pulliam v. Deans Management of N.Y., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 April 2009

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT