People v. Green
| Decision Date | 10 June 2005 |
| Docket Number | KA 02-01263. |
| Citation | 2005 NY Slip Op 04799,796 N.Y.S.2d 208,19 A.D.3d 1075 |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. COREY GREEN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered May 14, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1]). Defendant abandoned his motion seeking dismissal of the indictment based on the alleged denial of his right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.20 and 30.30 when he proceeded to trial despite the failure of Supreme Court to rule on his motion (see People v Sommerville, 6 AD3d 1232 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 648 [2004]; People v Rodriguez, 187 AD2d 291, 292 [1992]). In addition, he thereby failed to preserve for our review his present contention that the motion should have been granted (see Sommerville, 6 AD3d at 1232-1233; Rodriguez, 187 AD2d at 292). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), is legally sufficient to establish that defendant was an active participant in the robbery (see People v Knight, 192 AD2d 676 [1993], lv denied 81 NY2d 1075 [1993]). Also contrary to the contentions of defendant, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), and the record establishes that he received meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
Present — Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Baez
...825 N.Y.S.2d 222 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 924, 926, 834 N.Y.S.2d 514, 516, 866 N.E.2d 460, 462 [2007]; see People v. Green, 19 A.D.3d 1075, 1075, 796 N.Y.S.2d 208 [4th Dept. 2005], lv denied 5 N.Y.3d 828, 804 N.Y.S.2d 43, 837 N.E.2d 742 [2005] ; see also People v. Graves, 85 N.Y......
-
People v. Martin
...on that application ( see People v. Rodriguez, 50 N.Y.2d 553, 556-557, 429 N.Y.S.2d 631, 407 N.E.2d 475 [1980]; People v. Green, 19 A.D.3d 1075, 1075, 796 N.Y.S.2d 208 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 828, 804 N.Y.S.2d 43, 837 N.E.2d 742 [2005] ). As for the other issues raised in this appeal, d......
-
People v. Green
...742 5 N.Y.3d 828 PEOPLE v. GREEN (COREY). Court of Appeals of the State of New York. September 23, 2005. Appeal from 4th Dept.: 19 A.D.3d 1075, 796 N.Y.S.2d 208 Application for leave to appeal — criminal — denied. (R.S. Smith, J.) ...
-
People v. Bell
... ... We have examined defendant's contentions in the pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they are without merit ... Present — Green ... ...