People v. Grimes

Decision Date26 December 2006
Docket Number2006-02915.
Citation2006 NY Slip Op 10097,35 A.D.3d 882,827 N.Y.S.2d 268
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MELVIN GRIMES, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (see Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). The plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered in the presence of the defendant's counsel (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Holman, 33 AD3d 815 [2006]; People v Palmer, 29 AD3d 606 [2006]; People v Tissiera, 22 AD3d 611, 612 [2005]). Moreover, the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. The defense counsel obtained a favorable plea which limited the defendant's term of imprisonment and which satisfied two outstanding, unrelated felony charges. There is nothing in the record which casts doubt upon counsel's effectiveness (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]).

Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Bruno
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 11, 2010
    ...( see People v. Pooler, 58 A.D.3d at 757, 871 N.Y.S.2d 707; People v. Brooks, 36 A.D.3d 929, 930, 828 N.Y.S.2d 553; People v. Grimes, 35 A.D.3d 882, 883, 827 N.Y.S.2d 268; People v. Campbell, 180 A.D.2d 808, 809, 580 N.Y.S.2d 445; People v. Bourdonnay, 160 A.D.2d 1014, 1015, 555 N.Y.S.2d 13......
  • People v. Sumahit
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 20, 2010
    ...( see People v. Drago, 50 A.D.3d 920, 855 N.Y.S.2d 252; People v. Brooks, 36 A.D.3d 929, 930, 828 N.Y.S.2d 553; People v. Grimes, 35 A.D.3d 882, 883, 827 N.Y.S.2d 268). Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually......
  • People v. Shell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 18, 2010
    ...( see People v. Drago, 50 A.D.3d 920, 855 N.Y.S.2d 252; People v. Brooks, 36 A.D.3d 929, 930, 828 N.Y.S.2d 553; People v. Grimes, 35 A.D.3d 882, 883, 827 N.Y.S.2d 268). Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually......
  • People v. Amanze
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 27, 2011
    ...People v. Charpentier, 44 A.D.3d 680, 681, 843 N.Y.S.2d 380; People v. Brooks, 36 A.D.3d 929, 930, 828 N.Y.S.2d 553; People v. Grimes, 35 A.D.3d 882, 883, 827 N.Y.S.2d 268). The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. DILLON, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, DICKERSON and COHEN, JJ., ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT