People v. Guillebeaux

Decision Date24 February 2016
Citation136 A.D.3d 1055,25 N.Y.S.3d 613 (Mem)
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Darius GUILLEBEAUX, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Jacob Wells on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), both imposed July 25, 2013, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222 ; People v. Carter, 114 A.D.3d 960, 980 N.Y.S.2d 838 ; People v. Azeez, 95 A.D.3d 1349, 944 N.Y.S.2d 911 ).

ENG, P.J., DILLON, SGROI, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Argilagos
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 24, 2016

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT