People v. Azeez

• Decision Date: 30 May 2012
• Citation: 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 04187,95 A.D.3d 1349,944 N.Y.S.2d 911
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Mohamed AZEEZ, appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

95 A.D.3d 1349

944 N.Y.S.2d 911

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 04187

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,

v.Mohamed AZEEZ, appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

May 30, 2012.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Erica Horwitz of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Raciti, J.), imposed November 22, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645;People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222;People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;*912People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 735, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46;People v. Foy, 89 A.D.3d 1103, 1103, 933 N.Y.S.2d 599;People v. Pertillar, 37 A.D.3d 740, 831 N.Y.S.2d 212).

MASTRO, A.P.J., ANGIOLILLO, DICKERSON and HALL, JJ., concur.