People v. Hill

Decision Date21 October 1968
Citation30 A.D.2d 976,294 N.Y.S.2d 597
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ike HILL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

William Cahn, Dist. Atty., Nassau County, for respondent; Donald Paul DeRiggi, Asst. Dist. Atty., of counsel.

James J. McDonough, Atty. in Charge, Legal Aid Society of Nassau County, Criminal Division, Mineola, for defendant-appellant; Matthew Muraskin, Mineola, of counsel.

Before BELDOCK, P.J., and CHRIST, BRENNAN, RABIN and MARTUSCELLO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Order of the County Court, Nassau County, entered February 29, 1968, affirmed.

The only allegation in the petition which would entitle appellant to Coram nobis relief, if proved, was that the complaining witness had said off the record that he could not identify appellant as one of the men who robbed him and that the District Attorney, knowing of these statements, intentionally or unintentionally suppressed this evidence favorable to appellant. We can and do take judicial notice of the record on appeal in this court in People v. Ferguson, 26 A.D.2d 772, 272 N.Y.S.2d 977 and People v. Duff, 26 A.D.2d 772, 272 N.Y.S.2d 977 (Richardson, Evidence (9th ed.), § 30, and cases cited there). Appellant was tried together with Ferguson and Duff. The trial minutes establish that the complaining witness testified that he could not identify appellant as one of the men who had held him up. That record conclusively refutes appellant's claim.

There is no obligation to assign counsel to assist in the prosecution of specious issues (People ex rel. Williams v. La Vallee, 19 N.Y.2d 238, 241, 279 N.Y.S.2d 1, 3, 225 N.E.2d 735, 736).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Flanders
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 Noviembre 2013
    ... ... Boykins, 85 A.D.3d 1554, 1555, 924 N.Y.S.2d 711,lv. denied17 N.Y.3d 814, 929 N.Y.S.2d 802, 954 N.E.2d 93). Although the published decision in Boykins does not address the particular facts of the crimes, [w]e can and do take judicial notice of the record on appeal in that case ( People v. Hill, 30 A.D.2d 976, 976, 294 N.Y.S.2d 597;see People v. Crawford, 55 A.D.3d 1335, 1337, 864 N.Y.S.2d 820,lv. denied11 N.Y.3d 896, 873 N.Y.S.2d 272, 901 N.E.2d 766). In Boykins, the defendant was charged with one count of attempted murder, but the evidence established that there were two distinct ... ...
  • People v. Richardson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 20 Septiembre 1993
    ... ... Sanchez v. Hoke, 132 A.D.2d 861, 862, 518 N.Y.S.2d 69; People v. Boundy, 34 A.D.2d 829, 830, 312 N.Y.S.2d 485); or ... where the record conclusively refutes the factual allegations of defendant (People v. Boundy, supra; People v. Hill, 30 A.D.2d 976, 294 N.Y.S.2d 597); or where the motion repeats prior adjudicated claims (People ex rel. Baumgart v. Martin, 9 N.Y.2d 351, 354, 214 N.Y.S.2d 370, 174 N.E.2d 475, cert. denied 368 U.S. 962, 82 S.Ct. 399, 7 L.Ed.2d 393; People ex rel. Visconti v. McMann, 28 A.D.2d 1012, 1013, 283 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT