People v. Houston

Citation31 A.D.2d 777,297 N.Y.S.2d 349
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Junior HOUSTON, Appellant.
Decision Date09 January 1969
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Thomas Calandra, Medina, for appellant.

Hamilton Doherty, Albion, for respondent.

Before BASTOW, P.J., and DEL VECCHIO, MARSH, WITMER and HENRY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

The record shows that the defendant served copies of his brief upon the District Attorney in ample time for the latter to prepare and file his brief in response thereto for the December term of this Court. The District Attorney submitted no brief, however, and defaulted and the Court has been required to consider the appeal without benefit of a brief or argument on behalf of the People.

It is the duty of the District Attorney to represent the People on all such appeals from convictions obtained in his County, especially in cases of this seriousness (People v. Wright, 22 A.D.2d 754, 253 N.Y.S.2d 653). We deplore this apparent lack of interest on the part of the District Attorney.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Pacella
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 28, 1975
    ...796; and see People v. Pitsley, 37 A.D.2d 905, 325 N.Y.S.2d 451; People v. Cerio, 34 A.D.2d 1095, 312 N.Y.S.2d 596; People v. Houston, 31 A.D.2d 777, 297 N.Y.S.2d 349). The contentions in this case involve serious questions of law, and we deplore the apparent lack of interest in the case on......
  • People v. Cerio
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 30, 1970
    ...Attorney to represent the People on all such appeals. (See People v. Holcombe, 34 A.D.2d 728, 311 N.Y.S.2d 796; People v. Houston, 31 A.D.2d 777, 297 N.Y.S.2d 349; and People v. Wright, 22 A.D.2d 754, 253 N.Y.S.2d Judgment unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion by reducing the s......
  • People v. Pitsley
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • October 28, 1971
    ...v. Holcombe, 34 A.D.2d 728, 311 N.Y.S.2d 796; see also People v. Cerio, 34 A.D.2d 1095, 1096, 312 N.Y.S.2d 596, 597 and People v. Houston, 31 A.D.2d 777, 297 N.Y.S.2d 349). Judgment unanimously ...
  • People v. Holcombe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • April 9, 1970
    ...this requires that he file a brief stating his position concerning an appeal taken by a defendant * * *.' See also, People v. Houston, 31 A.D.2d 777, 297 N.Y.S.2d 349. This responsibility and duty of the District Attorney is in no way diminished or excused by reason of the fact that we have......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT