People v. Irizarry

Decision Date14 July 1997
Citation662 N.Y.S.2d 437,90 N.Y.2d 894
Parties, 685 N.E.2d 218 People v. Joseph Irizarry
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Smith, J.

--- A.D.2d ----, 661 N.Y.S.2d 147

App.Div. 4, Oneida 4/25/97

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Demagall
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 9 Enero 2014
    ... ... Tillman, 260 A.D.2d at 657, 688 N.Y.S.2d 276, quoting People v. Enchautegui, 156 A.D.2d 461, 461, 548 N.Y.S.2d 567 [1989], lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 787, 559 N.Y.S.2d 992, 559 N.E.2d 686 [1990]; see People v. Irizarry, 238 A.D.2d 940, 941, 661 N.Y.S.2d 147 [1997], lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 894, 662 N.Y.S.2d 437, 685 N.E.2d 218 [1997]; People v. Justice, 173 A.D.2d 144, 146, 579 N.Y.S.2d 502 [1991]; People v. Mainville, 59 A.D.2d 809, 809–810, 398 N.Y.S.2d 1012 [1977] ).         Turning to the evidence ... ...
  • People v. Jones
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 Mayo 1999
    ... ... denied 83 N.Y.2d 849, 612 N.Y.S.2d 381, 634 N.E.2d 982). Where, as here, there was conflicting expert evidence concerning criminal responsibility, the jury was free to accept or reject in whole or in part the opinion of any expert (see, People v. Irizarry, 238 A.D.2d 940, 941, 661 N.Y.S.2d 147, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 894, 662 N.Y.S.2d 437, 685 N.E.2d 218; People v. Smith, 217 A.D.2d 221, 234-235, 635 N.Y.S.2d 824, lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 977, 642 N.Y.S.2d 207, 664 N.E.2d 1270). Thus, contrary to the contention of defendant, the verdict rejecting his ... ...
  • People v. Hershey
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Junio 2011
    ...least in the absence of a serious flaw in the expert's testimony” ( People v. Irizarry, 238 A.D.2d 940, 941, 661 N.Y.S.2d 147, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 894, 662 N.Y.S.2d 437, 685 N.E.2d 218 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). We further conclude that County Court properly allowed the prosecut......
  • People v. Amin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 Mayo 2002
    ... ... Where, as here, there was conflicting expert testimony on the issue of defendant's mental condition, the determination of the trier of fact to accept or reject the opinion of an expert, in whole or in part, is entitled to deference (see People v Irizarry, 238 A.D.2d 940, 941, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 894; see also People v Law, 273 A.D.2d 897, 898, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 965; People v Jones, 261 A.D.2d 920, 920, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 972) ... The evidence that the victim had a blackened and swollen eye that throbbed for several days and a gash above her eye ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT