People v. Ivy
Decision Date | 11 September 1958 |
Docket Number | Cr. 6137 |
Citation | 163 Cal.App.2d 436,329 P.2d 505 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John D. IVY Defendant and Appellant. |
Fredric A. Spindell, Los Angeles, for appellant under appointment of the District Court of Appeal.
Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., and William E. James, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
In a nonjury trial defendant was convicted of two counts of selling heroin. Health & Safety Code, § 11500. He appeals from the judgment.
At the time of his arraignment defendant pleaded not guilty to the two counts charged in the information. Thereafter, defendant, with counsel present, pleaded guilty to count I. 1 At that time at defendant's request further proceedings as to count I and disposition of count II were continued. Later defendant, with counsel present, withdrew the plea of guilty to count I and pleaded not guilty thereto. The trial was had, and defendant was found guilty as charged in both counts.
Defendant testified in his own behalf and denied selling heroin, as charged in count I. In the course of his direct examination the following occurred:
'The Court: At that time I asked you whether or not you were guilty of Count II which charges the sale of this particular----
'Mr. Chandler: Pardon me, I believe that was Count I.
Defendant was then examined further by his counsel. In the course of this examination the following occurred:
Defendant's only point is that the court committed prejudicial error in the examination with respect to his plea of guilty to count I. People v. Ryan, 82 Cal. 617, 23 P. 121, held that after a plea of guilty has been withdrawn by permission of the court, and the plea of not guilty substituted, as provided by section 1018 of the Penal Code, the plea of guilty becomes functus officio, and cannot be proved on the trial as an admission or confession of the defendant; that to receive the evidence would defeat the privilege granted by section 1018 of the Penal Code. 2 People v. Boyd, 67 Cal.App. 292, 227 P. 783, was a prosecution for obtaining money by false pretenses. The defendant's offer to plead guilty to one offense charged if the court would continue the case was admitted in evidence over objection. The District Court of Appeal held that the trial court erred in overruling the objection but that the error was not prejudicial. In denying a hearing the Supreme Court said (67 Cal.App. at page 302, 227 P. at page 786):
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Wilson
...110, 117-118(1e), 183 P.2d 67). It has also been held that a plea of guilty, later withdrawn, is admissible (People v. Ivy (1958) 163 Cal.App.2d 436, 438-440(1), 329 P.2d 505; People v. Snell (1929) 96 Cal.App. 657, 662-663(4), 274 P. 560). The underlying theory of these cases is that by hi......
-
People v. Quinn
...383 P.2d 452; People v. Boyd, 67 Cal.App. 292, 303, 227 P. 783 (opinion of Supreme Court on denial of hearing); People v. Ivy, 163 Cal.App.2d App.2d 436, 438-440, 329 P.2d 505; People v. Clay, 208 Cal.App.2d 773, 777-779, 25 Cal.Rptr. 464; People v. Cooper, 81 Cal.App.2d 110, 117-118, 183 P......
-
People v. Hamilton
...Cal.App.2d 110, 117-118, 118, 183 P.2d 67). It has also been held that a plea of guilty, later withdrawn, is admissible (People v. Ivy, 163 Cal.App.2d 436, 329 P.2d 505). In the absence of statute, the underlying theory of these cases is that by his plea or offer to plead guilty the defenda......
-
People v. Quinn
...Earlier cases holding such a plea admissible (People v. Clay, 208 Cal.App.2d 773, 777-779, 25 Cal.Rptr. 464; People v. Ivy, 163 Cal.App.2d 436, 438-440, 329 P.2d 505; People v. Snell, 96 Cal.App. 657, 662-663, 274 P. 560; see People v. Russell, 77 Cal.App. 113, 120, 246 P. 110) are disappro......