People v. Jackson

Decision Date20 March 2019
Docket NumberInd. No. 435/16,2017-10084
Citation96 N.Y.S.3d 330,170 A.D.3d 1040
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Bobby JACKSON, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Clinton W. Calhoun III, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Brian R. Pouliot and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered September 5, 2017, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the People correctly contend that the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal is valid (see People v. Smith, 112 A.D.3d 759, 759, 976 N.Y.S.2d 564 ), the defendant's contention that the County Court should have granted his motion to withdraw his plea because it was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently survives such a valid waiver (see People v. Manragh, 150 A.D.3d 762, 51 N.Y.S.3d 431, affd 32 N.Y.3d 1101, 90 N.Y.S.3d 623, 114 N.E.3d 1076 ; People v. Towns, 135 A.D.3d 974, 22 N.Y.S.3d 914 ). Nonetheless, we agree with the court's determination denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court, and generally will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see CPL 220.60[3] ; People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 485, 743 N.Y.S.2d 45, 769 N.E.2d 802 ; People v. Boria, 157 A.D.3d 811, 69 N.Y.S.3d 3 ). "Generally, a plea of guilty may not be withdrawn absent some evidence of innocence, fraud, or mistake in its inducement" ( People v. Rodriguez, 142 A.D.3d 1189, 1190, 38 N.Y.S.3d 224 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). When a defendant moves to withdraw a plea of guilty, the nature and extent of the fact-finding inquiry rests largely in the discretion of the court, and a hearing will be granted only in rare instances (see People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 365 N.Y.S.2d 161, 324 N.E.2d 544 ; People v. Rodriguez, 154 A.D.3d 968, 969, 63 N.Y.S.3d 441 ).

Here, the record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered his plea of guilty (see People v. Boria, 157 A.D.3d at 812, 69 N.Y.S.3d 3 ; People v. Smith, 148 A.D.3d 939, 49 N.Y.S.3d 501 ). The defendant's contention that he was coerced into pleading guilty is premised on unsubstantiated and conclusory allegations and belied by his statements under oath at the plea proceeding. Thus, the statements were insufficient to warrant vacatur of his plea or a hearing on the issue (see People v. Ward, 140 A.D.3d 903, 32 N.Y.S.3d 648 ). Moreover, the mere fact that defense counsel may have advised the defendant as to the risks of trial, including the possibility of consecutive sentences upon conviction, is insufficient to establish coercion (see People v. Gomez, 137 A.D.3d 1161, 27 N.Y.S.3d 650 ; People v. Holcombe, 116 A.D.3d 1063, 983 N.Y.S.2d 875 ).

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of any contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel except to the extent that the alleged ineffective assistance affected the voluntariness of his plea (see People v. Dancy, 156 A.D.3d 717, 66 N.Y.S.3d 530 ; People v. Upson, 134 A.D.3d 1058, 21 N.Y.S.3d 688 ). The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside...

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • People v. Blount, 2017–08249
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 Octubre 2019
    ...sound discretion of the court, and generally will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion" ( People v. Jackson, 170 A.D.3d 1040, 1040, 96 N.Y.S.3d 330 ; see CPL 220.60[3] ; People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 485, 743 N.Y.S.2d 45, 769 N.E.2d 802 ). " ‘Generally, a plea......
  • People v. Etienne
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 21 Abril 2021
    ...970 N.Y.S.2d 919, 993 N.E.2d 405 ; People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524–525, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332 ; People v. Jackson, 170 A.D.3d 1040, 1040, 96 N.Y.S.3d 330 ; People v. Johnson, 97 A.D.3d at 695, 948 N.Y.S.2d 120 ). In particular, the defendant's claim of actual innocence a......
  • People v. Gizowski
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 24 Abril 2020
    ...plea colloquy. The court thus did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea (see People v. Jackson, 170 A.D.3d 1040, 1040–1041, 96 N.Y.S.3d 330 [2d Dept. 2019], lv denied 33 N.Y.3d 1070, 105 N.Y.S.3d 6, 129 N.E.3d 326 [2019] ; 120 N.Y.S.3d 902 Truitt, 170 A......
  • People v. Bhuiyan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 Marzo 2020
    ...a plea of guilty may not be withdrawn absent some evidence of innocence, fraud, or mistake in its inducement" ( People v. Jackson, 170 A.D.3d 1040, 1040, 96 N.Y.S.3d 330 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). A defendant's contention that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT