People v. Jacob
| Decision Date | 31 January 1977 |
| Citation | 391 N.Y.S.2d 165,55 A.D.2d 961 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. John JACOB, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Nicholas Ferraro, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (David Zucker, Kew Gardens, of counsel), for appellant.
Before COHALAN, Acting P.J., and MARGETT, SUOZZI and MOLLEN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the People, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 16, 1976, as granted the branch of defendant's motion which sought an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes and dismissal of the indictment, and did so with leave to resubmit to the same or another Grand Jury.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from.
The evidence against defendant before the Grand Jury consisted largely of the testimony of the detective who had investigated the June 14, 1975 burglary of the Transfiguration Church parish hall. The detective testified that entry had been gained by means of the removal of louvers from a window at the side of the building. The window was in a 'fenced-in area'; access could only be had by climbing over a 12-foot-high wall and fence. When the detective arrived at the scene, the louvers were lying on the side of the building. He processed the louvers for fingerprints and discovered two prints which were subsequently identified as belonging to the defendant.
This evidence, even though unexplained and uncontradicted, would not warrant a conviction by a trial jury (see People v. Potwora, 44 A.D.2d 207, 354 N.Y.S.2d 492). The evidence against defendant was circumstantial and we are unable to conclude that the evidence adduced did 'exclude 'to a moral certainty' every hypothesis but guilt' (see People v. Wachowicz, 22 N.Y.2d 369, 372, 292 N.Y.S.2d 867, 868, 239 N.E.2d 620, 622).
The People's reliance on Stevenson v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 43, 380 F.2d 590 is misplaced. In Stevenson fingerprints had been found on a metal box, underneath a glass table top, and on the bottom of a tea cannister, all of which had been Inside the burglarized premises since they were purchased. The items had all been purchased more than two years prior to the burglary and there was expert testimony that the fingerprints could last up to two years under ideal conditions.
By contrast, there was no testimony in the case at bar as to whether the fingerprints wree on the 'inside' or 'outside' surfaces of the removed louvers (cf. People v. Gates, 24 N.Y.2d...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Beauchamp
...lock. Our determinations are consistent with factually close decisions in our sister jurisdictions. For example, in People v. Jacob, 55 A.D.2d 961, 391 N.Y.S.2d 165 (1977), the New York Supreme Court dismissed a burglary indictment against a defendant where someone entered a church through ......
-
State v. Mitchell
...area during the period the burglary occurred, and no stolen goods were found in the defendant's possession); People v. Jacob, 55 A.D.2d 961, 391 N.Y.S.2d 165 (N.Y.App.Div.1977) (holding a defendant's prints on louvers removed from the point of entry, though unexplained and uncontradicted, w......
-
People v. Goodman
...1987); People v. Riddick, 130 A.D.2d 780 (2d Dep't, 1987); People v. Hall, 89 A.D.2d 898 (2d Dep't, 1982). But cf. People v. Jacob, 55 A.D.2d 961 (2d Dep't, 1977) (no testimony as to whether fingerprints were on inside or outside of window glass). To support a conviction, it must appear tha......
-
People v. Collins
...of innocence. Thus, it was not legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Jacob, 55 A.D.2d 961, 391 N.Y.S.2d 165; cf., People v. Jenkins, 115 A.D.2d 562, 496 N.Y.S.2d ...