People v. Jennings

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
CitationPeople v. Jennings, 352 N.Y.S.2d 444, 33 N.Y.2d 880 (N.Y. 1973)
Decision Date27 December 1973
Parties, 307 N.E.2d 561 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frederick Douglas JENNINGS, Appellant.

Order affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division, 40 A.D.2d 357, 340 N.Y.S.2d 25.

All concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • People v. Anderson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 3, 1981
    ...to the jury (People v. Reade, supra; People v. Jaehne, supra; People v. Jennings, 40 A.D.2d 357, 340 N.Y.S.2d 25, aff'd 33 N.Y.2d 880, 352 N.Y.S.2d 444, 307 N.E.2d 561). At the close of the People's direct case, defense counsel advised the court that he intended to call the defendant as a w......
  • People v. Newson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 4, 1979
    ...(See, also, People v. Stephen J. B., 23 N.Y.2d 611, 615, 298 N.Y.S.2d 489, 493, 246 N.E.2d 344, 347; People v. Jennings, 33 N.Y.2d 880, 352 N.Y.S.2d 444, 307 N.E.2d 561, affg. 40 A.D.2d 357, 363, 340 N.Y.S.2d 25, "The case before us, however, unlike Tanner, is not premised on the theory tha......
  • State v. Zarinsky
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • July 20, 1976
    ... ... Commonwealth v. Burns, supra; State v. Dudley, supra; Campbell v. People, 159 Ill. 9, 42 N.E. 123 (Sup.Ct.1895) (miscited by defendant as support for his position); People v. Corrales, 34 Cal.2d 426, 210 P.2d 843 ... § 60.60 (L.1970, c. 996, § 1, effective Sept. 1, 1971). See People v. Jennings, 40 A.D.2d 357, 340 N.Y.S.2d 25 (App.Div.), aff'd o.b. 33 N.Y.2d 880, 352 N.Y.S.2d 444, 307 N.E.2d 561 (Ct.App.1973); Cf. People v. Daniels, 37 ... ...
  • People v. Fentress
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • February 13, 1980
    ...S.Ct. 1394, 1398, 91 L.Ed. 1654; People v. Tanner, 30 N.Y.2d 102, 106, 331 N.Y.S.2d 1, 4, 282 N.E.2d 98, 99; People v. Jennings, 33 N.Y.2d 880, 352 N.Y.S.2d 444, 307 N.E.2d 561). The little that Enid knew of a highly ambiguous nature she did not disclose to Fentress and he could not have re......
  • Get Started for Free