People v. Johnson
| Decision Date | 16 December 1991 |
| Citation | 178 A.D.2d 549,577 N.Y.S.2d 459 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Tony JOHNSON, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Elizabeth Manning, of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Jay M. Cohen, Ruth E. Ross, and David O. Leiwant, of counsel; A. Tracey Campbell, on the brief), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and BRACKEN, HARWOOD and COPERTINO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), rendered May 3, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
On October 25, 1989, at approximately 11:10 P.M., the defendant was operating a brown Chevrolet in the vicinity of Atlantic Avenue and Washington Avenue in Brooklyn. Two police officers on regular motor patrol observed that the defendant's Chevrolet had no rear license plate.
In response to a signal from the patrol car, the defendant brought his vehicle to a stop. One officer, after approaching the driver's side of the defendant's car, requested that the defendant produce a driver's license, registration, and an insurance card. When the defendant proved unable to comply with these requests, he was asked to get out of the car.
According to one of the police officers, as the defendant exited the car, "his jacket was opened and there was a large bulge in his waistband on the left hand". This officer frisked the defendant and recovered a firearm.
On appeal, the defendant argues that the firearm was seized in violation of his right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures (see, U.S. Const., 4th and 14th Amends.; N.Y.Const. art. I, § 12), because a temporary license sticker was affixed to the vehicle he was driving. He reasons that the absence of a permanent license plate from that vehicle could not, therefore, properly serve as the basis for the initial stop (see, People v. Perez, 149 A.D.2d 344, 539 N.Y.S.2d 750).
There was some evidence to support a finding that a temporary sticker was being displayed on the vehicle in question at the time of the incident. However, the officers testified that they did not see the sticker before they as...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. White
...(see People v. Harris, 122 A.D.3d 942, 944, 997 N.Y.S.2d 481 ; People v. Stevenson, 7 A.D.3d 820, 779 N.Y.S.2d 498 ; People v. Johnson, 178 A.D.2d 549, 577 N.Y.S.2d 459 ; People v. Bush, 171 A.D.2d 801, 567 N.Y.S.2d 518 ), or any indication that the defendant was reaching for, grabbing at, ......
-
People v. Hinshaw
...). Here, the Trooper's actions in temporarily stopping the car to investigate further were objectively reasonable (see People v. Johnson, 178 A.D.2d 549, 550, 577 N.Y.S.2d 459 [2d Dept. 1991], lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 920, 582 N.Y.S.2d 80, 590 N.E.2d 1208 [1992] ). Once the Trooper smelled burnt......
-
People v. Germany
...The articulable justification for the stop of the taxi was the violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. People v. Johnson, 178 A.D.2d 549, 577 N.Y.S.2d 459 (1991); People v. Coggins, 175 A.D.2d 924, 573 N.Y.S.2d 760 (1991). In fact, Officer Rodriguez had not seen the defendant in the car w......
- People v. Jackson