People v. Johnson
Decision Date | 28 March 1995 |
Docket Number | No. F020694,F020694 |
Citation | 39 Cal.Rptr.2d 463,33 Cal.App.4th 623 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Fredrick Debrigadier JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant. |
Defendant was charged by amended information as follows: counts I and II--separate incidents of forcible rape (Pen.Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)) 1 and count III--attempted forcible oral copulation (§§ 288a, subd. (c), 664). It was further alleged as to each count that defendant had been convicted of and served prison terms for two prior sex offenses (§ 667.6, subd. (b)) and had been convicted of two prior serious felonies (§ 667, subd. (a)). The information also alleged the offenses charged in counts I and II were serious felonies (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(3)).
On October 19, 1993, the court granted defendant's motion to bifurcate the prior conviction allegations and a jury trial commenced. The jury found defendant guilty on all counts. Defendant then waived his right to a jury trial on the prior conviction allegations.
On October 25, 1993, the court granted a motion to amend counts I and II of the amended information with respect to the section 667.6, subdivision (b) allegations. The amendments reflected defendant had been convicted of a violation of section "261, Subsection 2, rape by force or fear on or about ... April 13th, 1987 ... in the Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Kern," and that defendant had been convicted of a violation of "Arizona Revised Statute 1340 ... to wit, sexual assault, on or about ... September 3rd, 1981...."
On the same date, the court found all of the special allegations to be true.
At the sentencing hearing, the court denied defendant probation and sentenced him to state prison for a total term of 36 years. The court imposed the upper term of eight years on count I, a consecutive eight-year upper term on count II, two consecutive ten-year enhancements pursuant to section 667.6, subdivision (b), and a concurrent four-year upper term on count III. The court granted a total of 224 days of custody credits and ordered defendant to pay a $200 restitution fine (Gov.Code, § 13967, subd. (a)).
Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal.
Since defendant has limited his appeal to sentencing issues, the following facts are taken from the report of the probation officer filed November 30, 1993:
I. DID THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY ENHANCE DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE?
Defendant contends the 20-year enhancement of his sentence must be stricken because, in his view, section 667.6, subdivision (b) does not authorize the use of foreign convictions such as his 1987 Arizona conviction for sexual assault.
At the time of the instant offenses, section 667.6 stated in relevant part:
Defendant argues on appeal:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Jaffe
... ... ( People v. Butler (1998) 68 Cal. App.4th 421, 439-440, 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 357 [sexually violent predator law applies to out-of-state crimes]; People v. Johnson ... 19 Cal.Rptr.3d 700 ... (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 623, 631-633, 39 Cal. Rptr.2d 463 [sex crime enhancement applies to out-of-state crimes].) The use of common names for many of the crimes described in subdivision (b) of section 12021.1 suggests that there was no intent to limit "(18) Robbery" to ... ...
-
People v. Jaffe, H026265 (CA 10/13/2004)
...(People v. Butler (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 421, 439-440 [sexually violent predator law applies to out-of-state crimes]; People v. Johnson (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 623, 631-633 [sex crime enhancement applies to out-of-state crimes].) The use of common names for many of the crimes described in subd......
-
People v. Frawley, A088519.
...two will be reconciled and construed so as to uphold both of them if it is reasonably possible to do so." (People v. Johnson (1995) 33 Cal. App.4th 623, 631-632, 39 Cal.Rptr.2d 463.) As shall appear, defendant's argument relies on purely formalistic parsing which bypasses the all-important ......
-
People v. Shea
...using one violent sex prior (§ 667.6, subd. (a)) to enhance three counts, each a violent sex conviction. (See People v. Johnson (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 623, 39 Cal.Rptr.2d 463.) We are not concerned with imposition of enhancements for two convictions on charges brought together, one a serious......
-
Horizontal federalism in an age of criminal justice interconnectedness.
...corresponding tensions." Paul A. Freund, Umpiring the Federal System 54 COLUM. L. REV. 561, 561 (1954). (21) See People v. Johnson, 39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 463, 470 (Ct. App. 1995) (endorsing the goal of "attacking the recidivism of violent sex offenders by providing for longer enhancements for pr......