People v. Jones
| Decision Date | 04 February 1997 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samantha JONES, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Arthur D. Middlemiss, for Respondent.
Donald E. Cameron, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and ELLERIN, RUBIN and MAZZARELLI, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.) rendered December 17, 1992, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing her to a term of 1 1/2 to 4 1/2 years, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
Defendant was convicted based upon evidence which included her admission that while shaking her 23-day old infant son back and forth so vigorously that his head snapped forward and back, she lost her grip and forcibly propelled the infant to the floor six feet away. The medical testimony supported the conclusion that the infant's catastrophic injuries were consistent with "shaken baby syndrome". Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving the People the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, we find that the evidence was sufficient to support the elements of assault in the first degree under a depraved indifference theory (People v. Nix, 173 A.D.2d 285, 569 N.Y.S.2d 677, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 971, 574 N.Y.S.2d 951, 580 N.E.2d 423; see also, People v. Paul, 209 A.D.2d 447, 618 N.Y.S.2d 456. lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 865, 624 N.Y.S.2d 384, 648 N.E.2d 804). Moreover, upon exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.
Defendant was not entitled to dismissal of the indictment based on alleged defects in the Grand Jury proceedings (see, People v. Sinski, 88 N.Y.2d 487, 495, 646 N.Y.S.2d 651, 669 N.E.2d 809; People v. Huston, 88 N.Y.2d 400, 409, 646 N.Y.S.2d 69, 668 N.E.2d 1362). Examination of the Grand Jury minutes demonstrates that defendant was given a full and fair opportunity to make a complete statement before being questioned by the Assistant District Attorney, whose cross-examination was within proper bounds (People v. Karp, 76 N.Y.2d 1006, 565 N.Y.S.2d 751, 566 N.E.2d 1156, revg. on dissenting opn. of Sullivan, J., 158 A.D.2d 378, 385, 388-389, 551 N.Y.S.2d 503). While defendant's pre-arrest statements to police were ultimately suppressed as obtained in violation of her right to counsel, there was no evidence that the statements were obtained involuntarily; therefore they were properly used for impeachment purposes before the Grand Jury (People v. Maerling, 64 N.Y.2d 134, 485 N.Y.S.2d 23, 474 N.E.2d 231). Defendant's remaining contentions concerning the Grand Jury presentation are without merit.
We have reviewed defendant's claims regarding the effectiveness of defendant's first counsel, who was...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Natalie AA.
...254 A.D.2d 809, 809, 678 N.Y.S.2d 182 [1998], lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 983, 683 N.Y.S.2d 764, 706 N.E.2d 752 [1998] ; People v. Jones, 236 A.D.2d 217, 218, 653 N.Y.S.2d 323 [1997], lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1036, 659 N.Y.S.2d 867, 681 N.E.2d 1314 [1997] ). The single characteristic that Nora was fus......
-
People v. Britt
...as to display indifference to human life" (People v Parrotte, 267 A.D.2d 884, 886, supra; see, People v Goodridge, 251 A.D.2d 85; People v Jones, 236 A.D.2d 217, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1036; People v Nix, 173 A.D.2d 285, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 971). Defendant's admitted continued brutality of her......
-
People v. Mathurine
...People v. Mirenda, 23 N.Y.2d 439, 297 N.Y.S.2d 532, 245 N.E.2d 194 [1969] ), testimony before a grand jury (People v. Jones, 236 A.D.2d 217, 653 N.Y.S.2d 323 [1st Dept. 1997]appeal denied89 N.Y.2d 1036, 659 N.Y.S.2d 867, 681 N.E.2d 1314 [1997] ), statements made to EMS workers (People v. Es......
-
Toaspern v. Laduca Law Firm LLP, 524322.
...prepare for trial, defendants here are permitted to rely on his testimony from that trial—a party admission (see People v. Jones, 236 A.D.2d 217, 219, 653 N.Y.S.2d 323 [1997], lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1036, 681 N.E.2d 1314, 659 N.Y.S.2d 867 [1997] )—wherein he stated that he did not review cert......