People v. Kelly
| Decision Date | 08 November 1993 |
| Citation | People v. Kelly, 604 N.Y.S.2d 821, 198 A.D.2d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993) |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Michael KELLY, a/k/a Earl Frazier, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
J. Patrick DeLince, Fresh Meadows, for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Steven J. Chananie, Gary Fidel, and Kiran K. Heer-Andrade, of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County(Orgera, J.), rendered October 29, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
By pleading guilty the defendant forfeited the right to challenge the indictment as having been obtained in violation of his right to testify before the Grand Jury (see, People v. Wallace, 188 A.D.2d 499, 591 N.Y.S.2d 60;People v. Smith, 168 A.D.2d 915, 564 N.Y.S.2d 884;People v. Ferrara, 99 A.D.2d 257, 472 N.Y.S.2d 407;see also, People v. Taylor, 65 N.Y.2d 1, 5, 489 N.Y.S.2d 152, 478 N.E.2d 755;People v. Gerber, 182 A.D.2d 252, 589 N.Y.S.2d 171).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Ortiz
...his right to testify before the Grand Jury had been violated (see, People v. Lasher, 199 A.D.2d 595, 605 N.Y.S.2d 973; People v. Kelly, 198 A.D.2d 305, 604 N.Y.S.2d 821; People v. Torra, 191 A.D.2d 738, 594 N.Y.S.2d 419; People v. Ferrara, 99 A.D.2d 257, 472 N.Y.S.2d 407). Further, the tria......
-
People v. Glaudel
...right to challenge the indictment as having been obtained in violation of his right to testify before the Grand Jury (People v. Kelly, 198 A.D.2d 305, 604 N.Y.S.2d 821; People v. Evans, 204 A.D.2d 346, 614 N.Y.S.2d 151; see also, People v. Franklin, 232 A.D.2d 577, 648 N.Y.S.2d 986; People ......
-
People v. Morgan
...569 N.Y.S.2d 86), as well as his claim that the People failed to provide him notice of the Grand Jury proceedings (see, People v. Kelly, 198 A.D.2d 305, 604 N.Y.S.2d 821; People v. Roberts, 163 A.D.2d 68, 557 N.Y.S.2d 85; People v. Roberson, 149 A.D.2d 926, 540 N.Y.S.2d 60). There is no mer......
- People v. Jenerette