People v. Knapp

Citation440 N.Y.S.2d 416,82 A.D.2d 971
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ricky A. KNAPP, Appellant.
Decision Date18 June 1981
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

John H. Owen, Otsego County Public Defender, Cooperstown, for appellant.

Colin E. Ingham, Otsego County Dist. Atty., Oneonta, for respondent.

Before SWEENEY, J. P., and MAIN, YESAWICH and HERLIHY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County, rendered July 3, 1978, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of murder in the second degree.

Linda Velzy, a student attending the State University College at Oneonta, was last seen alive on December 9, 1977. An intensive investigation to discover her whereabouts was undertaken by the City of Oneonta Police Department in conjunction with the New York State Police and the campus security police.

Acting on information furnished them by an informant, the authorities apprehended defendant Knapp on January 1, 1978 while he was attempting to drag the young woman's frozen body from the trunk of a car to a previously excavated gravesite. While being grappled to the ground, he allegedly cried out, "I am sorry, I am sorry. I killed her. I am no good. Please shoot me."

Of the many issues defendant raises, only one, the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress a three-page typewritten confession, warrants comment. That statement was made in the absence of counsel at a time when the police were aware that defendant had retained an attorney with respect to pending unrelated sodomy and unlawful imprisonment charges lodged against him and after a city police detective had been advised by the attorney not to question Knapp regarding Miss Velzy's disappearance. As indicated by the case law in this area, developed since the trial herein was completed, the confession should have been suppressed (People v. Albro, 52 N.Y.2d 619, 439 N.Y.S.2d 836, 422 N.E.2d 496 People v. Kazmarick, 52 N.Y.2d 322, 438 N.Y.S.2d 247, 420 N.E.2d 45; People v. Bell, 50 N.Y.2d 869, 430 N.Y.S.2d 43, 407 N.E.2d 1340; People v. Rogers, 48 N.Y.2d 167, 422 N.Y.S.2d 18, 397 N.E.2d 709). Here, however, the evidence of defendant's guilt was so overwhelming that the written confession was merely surplusage. A reading of the record leads to but one conclusion: there is no reasonable possibility that admission of this confession contributed to defendant's conviction. Since we view its admission as harmless error (see People v. Almestica, 42 N.Y.2d 222, 397 N.Y.S.2d 709, 366 N.E.2d 799), the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

SWEENEY, J. P., and MAIN, YESAWICH and HERLIHY, JJ., concur.

MIKOLL, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum.

MIKOLL, Justice (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent.

I agree with the majority that the confession should have been suppressed. However, I cannot agree with the majority's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Knapp v. Leonardo
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 24 Enero 1995
    ...confession had been obtained in violation of Knapp's right to counsel under the state constitution. People v. Knapp, 82 A.D.2d 971, 971, 440 N.Y.S.2d 416, 417 (3d Dep't 1981) (mem.) ("Knapp I "), rev'd and remanded, 57 N.Y.2d 161, 441 N.E.2d 1057, 455 N.Y.S.2d 539 (1982). In light of the ov......
  • People v. Knapp
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 12 Octubre 1982
    ...the jury acquitted defendant of intentional murder but convicted him of reckless murder. On appeal, the Appellate Division 82 A.D.2d 971, 440 N.Y.S.2d 416 rejected all but one of the several contentions advanced on defendant's behalf. As to that contention, each Judge on the panel agreed th......
  • People v. Knapp
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 21 Noviembre 1985
    ...right to counsel and should have been suppressed, such error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (82 A.D.2d 971, 440 N.Y.S.2d 416). The Court of Appeals reversed, finding that certain other inculpatory statements and tangible evidence, as well as the confession, shou......
  • People v. Weinman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 Diciembre 1982
    ...even after counsel has entered the matter on his behalf (People v. Knapp, 57 N.Y.2d 161, 455 N.Y.S.2d 539, 441 N.E.2d 1057). At issue in the Knapp case, however, was the admissibility of statements made by the accused to an undisclosed police informer prior to discovery of the victim's body......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT