People v. Kvalheim

Decision Date20 January 1966
Citation17 N.Y.2d 510,267 N.Y.S.2d 512
Parties, 214 N.E.2d 789 The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. Nils KVALHEIM, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeals from Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

Complaint charged that defendant and another, with intent to provoke a breach of the peace and under circumstances whereby breach of the peace might be occasioned, did loiter and lounge while drinking from a common bottle and refused to move on when ordered to do so to the annonyance of persons in the vicinity.

Defendant was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct and was sentenced to a term of 60 days' imprisonment. The Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, Ludwig Glowa, J., entered judgment, and the defendant appealed.

The Appellate Term entered an order reversing the judgment of the Criminal Court and dismissing the complaint and held that record indicated that the Criminal Court had not advised the defendant of his constitutional right to the effective aid of assigned counsel, or an adjournment before determining that a plea of guilty should be entered.

The People of the State of New York appealed to the Court of Appeals by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals from part of order dismissing the complaint.

Order affirmed. Dismissal of the complaint (instead of remission for a new arraignment) was proper here since defendant had already served his sentence of imprisonment (People v. Witenski, 15 N.Y.2d 392, 259 N.Y.S.2d 413, 207 N.E.2d 358). Since appellant appeals from that part only of the order which dismisses the complaint was make no determination as to the correctness of so much of the Appellate Term decision as holds that defendant was not properly informed of his rights.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • People v. Granese
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 28, 1969
    ...result of a thorough search. Since appellant has completed his sentence, the indictment should be dismissed (People v. Kvalheim, 17 N.Y.2d 510, 511, 267 N.Y.S.2d 512, 214 N.E.2d 789). CHRIST, Acting P.J., and BRENNAN, HOPKINS and MARTUSCELLO, JJ., concur. MUNDER, Justice, dissents and votes......
  • People v. Allen
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 1976
    ...use of a motor vehicle) People v. Scala, 26 N.Y.2d 753, 309 N.Y.S.2d 200, 257 N.E.2d 648 (petit larceny); People v. Kvalheim, 17 N.Y.2d 510, 267 N.Y.S.2d 512, 214 N.E.2d 789 (disorderly conduct); People v. Witenski, 15 N.Y.2d 392, 259 N.Y.S.2d 413, 207 N.E.2d 358 (petit larceny)). In none o......
  • People v. Simmons
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 3, 1973
    ...sentences, the charges must be dismissed. (People v. Scala, 26 N.Y.2d 753, 309 N.Y.S.2d 200, 257 N.E.2d 648; People v. Kvalheim, 17 N.Y.2d 510, 267 N.Y.S.2d 512, 214 N.E.2d 789.) FULD, C.J., and BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, GABRIELLI and JONES, JJ., Order reversed and the information dismissed. *......
  • People v. Sabino
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term
    • April 25, 2016
    ...proceedings. Instead, we dismiss the accusatory instruments at issue (see People v. Flynn, 79 N.Y.2d 879, 882 [1992] ; People v. Kvalheim, 17 N.Y.2d 510 [1966] ; People v. Smith, 34 Misc.3d 71 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2014]; cf. People v. Allen, 39 N.Y.2d 916, 917–918 [1976]......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT