People v. Lawhorn
Decision Date | 30 September 2005 |
Docket Number | KA 04-00555. |
Citation | 804 N.Y.S.2d 517,2005 NY Slip Op 07058,21 A.D.3d 1289 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE LAWHORN, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Dennis M. Kehoe, A.J.), rendered January 9, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the conviction of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25) under the second count of the indictment to manslaughter in the second degree (§ 125.15 [1]) and vacating the sentence imposed on that count and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for sentencing on that conviction.
Memorandum:On appeal from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction of depraved indifference murder. We agree.
Defendant admitted that he intentionally stabbed the victim once in the chest, but he contended that he meant only to inflict pain. The videotape of the incident, which was admitted in evidence, depicts defendant entering the store where the crime occurred, stabbing the victim once and then leaving the store. The Deputy Medical Examiner testified that the object used by defendant to stab the victim passed through the victim's sternum and through the left atrium of the victim's heart. Thus, according to the Deputy Medical Examiner, defendant must have used "significant" and "[s]ubstantial force" in causing the injury. The jury acquitted defendant of intentional murder, but convicted him of depraved indifference murder.
We conclude that this case falls within the "overwhelming majority" of cases in which depraved indifference murder should not have been charged (People v. Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 270 [2004], rearg denied 3 NY3d 767 [2004]; cf. People v. Sanchez, 98 NY2d 373, 376-377 [2002]). "Absent the type of circumstances in, for example, Sanchez (, a one-on-one shooting or knifing )(or similar killing) can almost never qualify as depraved indifference murder" (Payne, 3 NY3d at 272; see People v. Hafeez, 100 NY2d 253, 258-259 [2003]). Even where others are not endangered, there is (Payne, 3 NY3d at 271-272). There is no rational view of the evidence by which the jury could have found that defendant acted with the "uncommon brutality" necessary to meet the standard for depraved indifference murder in this one-on-one knifing (id. at 271; see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). We therefore modify the judgment by reducing the conviction of murder in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Ippolito
...contention that the verdict with respect to those counts is against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v. Lawhorn, 21 A.D.3d 1289, 1291, 804 N.Y.S.2d 517). We also agree with defendant that he was entitled to a hearing on the amount of restitution. Pursuant to Penal Law § 60.......
-
People v. Richardson
... ... The court therefore ... properly excluded the video on the ground that it did not ... "tend[] to prove the existence or non-existence of a ... material fact, i.e., a fact directly at issue in the ... case" (People v Primo, 96 N.Y.2d 351, 355 ... [2001]; see People v Lawhorn, 21 A.D.3d 1289, 1291 ... [4th Dept 2005]) ... Defendant's ... contention that the evidence is not legally sufficient to ... support the conviction is preserved for our review only with ... respect to the issue of identity (see generally People v ... Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19 ... ...
-
People v. Chiarappa
...People v. Grace, 60 A.D.3d 432, 433, 874 N.Y.S.2d 94, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 854, 881 N.Y.S.2d 665, 909 N.E.2d 588; People v. Lawhorn, 21 A.D.3d 1289, 1291, 804 N.Y.S.2d 517). In addition, the fact that the court briefly mentioned another charge did not deny defendant his right to present a d......
-
People v. Lawhorn
...N.E.2d 799 6 N.Y.3d 777 PEOPLE v. LAWHORN. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. January 30, 2006. Appeal from 4th Dept.: 21 A.D.3d 1289, 804 N.Y.S.2d 517 Application for leave to criminal appeal Withdrawn Ciparick, J.) ...