People v. Lewis

Decision Date19 December 2002
Citation300 A.D.2d 827,752 N.Y.S.2d 172
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>QUENTIN J. LEWIS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.

Carpinello, J Charged in a two-count indictment with murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree, as a principal and/or accomplice (see Penal Law § 20.00), defendant was found guilty of the latter following a jury trial. The charges stem from the stabbing death of a fellow inmate at Coxsackie Correctional Facility in Greene County. Sentenced as a second felony offender to 25 years in prison, defendant appeals. We now affirm.

We first reject defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the jury's verdict (see Penal Law § 10.00 [10]; §§ 20.00, 125.20 [1]). The record reveals that a mess hall dispute between inmates George Holden (hereinafter the victim) and Eddie Buckley continued when the two returned to their dormitory. According to one witness, the victim asked other inmates for a weapon, without success, and demanded that defendant, who was a friend of Buckley, remain in his cubicle. Notwithstanding the victim's directive, defendant exited his cubicle, crouched down low so as to escape detection, secreted to the recreation room and joined in the fight then in progress between Buckley and the victim.

The evidence further revealed that Buckley possessed a shank immediately before the altercation and was observed stabbing the victim. Defendant, however, was also observed repeatedly lunging at the victim, although no weapon was actually seen in his hands. Both men were observed wearing gloves. As a result of the fight, the victim suffered numerous superficial stab wounds and one fatal wound to the back which penetrated his heart and caused internal bleeding. A subsequent search of the dormitory produced two shanks which had been hidden in a small box and thrown in a garbage can near the fight. While no physical or testimonial evidence specifically connected these weapons with the victim's death, the pathologist who conducted the autopsy testified that the fatal injury was consistent with the use of such weapons.

Defendant took the stand in his own defense and denied any involvement in the incident, claiming instead to have remained in his cubicle during the fight. Viewing this evidence in a light most favorable to the People and indulging in all reasonable inferences in their favor, we find a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury, namely, that defendant, as a principal and/or as Buckley's accomplice, intended to cause serious physical injury to the victim and that death resulted (see id.; see also People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; People v Schermerhorn, 125 AD2d 729, lv denied 69 NY2d 955). We likewise find, upon the exercise of our factual review power, that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; see also People v Reynolds, 269 AD2d 735, lv denied 95 NY2d 838, cert denied 531 US 945).

One other argument merits brief discussion. Defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to instruct...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People v. Griffin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 mars 2022
    ...252 [2008] ; People v. Buskey , 13 A.D.3d 1058, 1059, 787 N.Y.S.2d 796 [4th Dept. 2004] ; see generally People v. Lewis , 300 A.D.2d 827, 829, 752 N.Y.S.2d 172 [3d Dept. 2002], lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 630, 760 N.Y.S.2d 111, 790 N.E.2d 285 [2003] ). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant was en......
  • People v. Nafi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 octobre 2015
    ...established that defendant “intended to cause serious physical injury to the victim and that death resulted” (People v. Lewis, 300 A.D.2d 827, 828, 752 N.Y.S.2d 172, lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 630, 760 N.Y.S.2d 111, 790 N.E.2d 285 ; see People v. Rutledge, 70 A.D.3d 1368, 1369, 894 N.Y.S.2d 668, ......
  • People v. Coker
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 octobre 2014
    ...924, 913 N.Y.S.2d 650, 939 N.E.2d 816 [2010] ; see People v. Stanton, 21 A.D.3d 576, 577, 799 N.Y.S.2d 342 [2005] ; People v. Lewis, 300 A.D.2d 827, 829, 752 N.Y.S.2d 172 [2002], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 630, 760 N.Y.S.2d 111, 790 N.E.2d 285 [2003] ). Here, Jacqueway's testimony that immediatel......
  • People v. Griffin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 11 mars 2022
    ... ... camera video depicting the robbery and murder (see People ... v Geddes, 49 A.D.3d 1255, 1256-1257 [4th Dept 2008], ... lv denied 10 N.Y.3d 863 [2008]; People v ... Buskey, 13 A.D.3d 1058, 1059 [4th Dept 2004]; see ... generally People v Lewis, 300 A.D.2d 827, 829 [3d Dept ... 2002], lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 630 [2003]). Even ... assuming, arguendo, that defendant was entitled to such a ... charge, we conclude that the "single error in failing to ... request such a charge [would] not constitute ineffective ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT