People v. Lewis

Decision Date04 April 1985
Citation478 N.E.2d 198,64 N.Y.2d 1031,489 N.Y.S.2d 57
Parties, 478 N.E.2d 198 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth LEWIS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The trial court, in its instructions, improperly removed from the jury's consideration all of the elements of the crimes charged except for that of identification. This error, preserved for our review by defense counsel's timely objection, his request for curative instructions and a motion made for a mistrial, deprived defendant of a fair trial, for "matter how conclusive the evidence * * * each of the * * * fundamental facts was for the jury to pass upon" (People v. Walker, 198 N.Y. 329, 334, 91 N.E. 806; see also, People v. Steele, 26 N.Y.2d 526, 529, 311 N.Y.S.2d 889, 260 N.E.2d 527). Although the admission by a defendant or his counsel of the existence of any of the elements of the crimes with which he was charged may have excused a court's removal of these elements from the jury's consideration (see, People v. Walker, supra, 198 N.Y. p. 335, 91 N.E. 806; People v. Brady, 16 N.Y.2d 186, 189-190, 264 N.Y.S.2d 361, 211 N.E.2d 815) there was no such admission during the trial of this case.

WACHTLER, C.J., and JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER, JJ., concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 19 Diciembre 1991
    ...consideration of the crime elements are deemed prejudicial " '[n]o matter how conclusive the evidence' " (People v. Lewis, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 1032, 489 N.Y.S.2d 57, 478 N.E.2d 198, quoting People v. Walker, 198 N.Y. 329, 334, 91 N.E. 806). Similarly, errors affecting the jury's deliberative pr......
  • People v. Pierre
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 18 Marzo 1996
    ...to stipulate (see People v. Pelose, 116 Misc.2d 788, 456 N.Y.S.2d 619). In contrast, the Court of Appeals in People v. Lewis, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 1032, 489 N.Y.S.2d 57, 478 N.E.2d 198, and People v. Flynn, 79 N.Y.2d 879, 881, 581 N.Y.S.2d 160, 589 N.E.2d 383, implied that with the consent of a ......
  • People v. Wilcox
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 Junio 1993
    ...County Court should have charged the jury with the legal principles pertinent to that issue (see, CPL 300.10[2]; People v. Lewis, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 489 N.Y.S.2d 57, 478 N.E.2d 198). Contrary to the People's position, County Court did not adequately address this issue elsewhere in its charge a......
  • People v. Jagdharry
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 4 Junio 2014
    ...fact is for the jury to pass upon ( see People v. Flynn, 79 N.Y.2d 879, 881, 581 N.Y.S.2d 160, 589 N.E.2d 383;People v. Lewis, 64 N.Y.2d 1031, 1032, 489 N.Y.S.2d 57, 478 N.E.2d 198;People v. Walker, 198 N.Y. 329, 334, 91 N.E. 806). Furthermore, CPL 300.10 imposes upon the trial court in a c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT