People v. Martin

Decision Date06 May 1996
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Edward MARTIN, Appellant.

Alicia S. O'Connor, West Islip, for appellant.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead (Michael J. Miller, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered August 16, 1994, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the defendant failed to establish his burden of proving that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 353, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687; People v. Montford, 134 A.D.2d 207, 521 N.Y.S.2d 7).

BRACKEN, J.P., and MILLER, JOY, HART and KRAUSMAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Boehm, 2004 NY Slip Op 50945(U) (NY 8/30/2004)
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 30, 2004
    ...614 N.Y.S.2d 151 (2d Dept. 1994); People v. Stevens, 193 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 967 (2d Dept. 1993); see also People v. Martin, 227 A.D.2d 416, 642 N.Y.S.2d 548 (2d Dept. 1996). The trial judge, best able to determine a motion to withdraw a guilty plea, is given discretion to determine if......
  • People v. Gordon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 6, 1996

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT