People v. McDonnel

Decision Date23 July 1979
Docket NumberDocket No. 78-25
Citation91 Mich.App. 458,283 N.W.2d 773
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Joseph McDONNEL, a/k/a Thomas Joseph Minns, a/k/a James Patrick Gaughran, a/k/a James A. Hunter, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. 91 Mich.App. 458, 283 N.W.2d 773
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

[91 MICHAPP 459] James Howard Grant, Detroit, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., John L. Thompson, Pros. Atty., Leonard J. Malinowski, Pros. Attys. App. Service, Lansing, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RILEY, P. J., and V. J. BRENNAN and CROCKETT, * JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On September 20, 1977, defendant entered a plea of guilty in the Schoolcraft County Circuit Court to the crime of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree, M.C.L. § 750.520c(1)(a); M.S.A. § 28.788(3)(1)(a), growing out of his alleged touching of the private parts of a boy below the age of 13 years. On October 21, 1977, he was sentenced to a prison term of 7 to 15 years.

Defendant appealed and filed a motion for remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. He contended that his guilty plea was not understandingly made and also that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. In support of these contentions he asserted that his court-appointed [91 MICHAPP 460] counsel knew, or had reason to know, that the defendant had an extended history of psychiatric disorders and treatments and yet made no attempt to obtain a forensic evaluation and hearing to determine the issue of his competency to stand trial, to explore the possibility of a defense of insanity, or to subject the state of defendant's mental condition to the court at the time of his plea and sentencing. On July 17, 1978, this Court granted the motion.

A hearing was held in the trial court on September 28 and 29, 1978. Testimony was received from defendant's and the people's psychiatrists, from defendant's trial counsel, from a psychotherapist familiar with the defendant and from defendant's probation officer. The trial court found the defendant capable of understanding the proceedings and of assisting in his defense. The court further found that the defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel.

Our review of the record confirms that the defendant had a history of psychiatric disorders going back several years and is alleged to have been hospitalized at age 20 or 21 for a similar offense. At the evidentiary hearing, defendant's appointed trial counsel stated that he had been aware of defendant's problems and thought that "we would be involved with an insanity defense because of the nature of the crime involved". But when defendant denied his guilt, counsel testified, "I forgot about anything to do with an insanity defense". Counsel later testified: "The probability in my judgment was that we were better advised to take the offered plea that we had than to proceed any further."

An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is reviewable after a guilty plea. People v. Kyllonen, [91 MICHAPP 461] 80 Mich.App. 327, 263 N.W.2d 55 (1977). Our Supreme Court in ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 1982
    ...(defense attorney failed to challenge a weak identification or challenge a confession defendant said was coerced); People v. McDonnell, 91 Mich.App. 458, 283 N.W.2d 773 (1979) (attorney did not seriously investigate or advance an insanity defense for allegedly tactical reasons); People v. B......
  • People v. Shahideh
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • December 29, 2008
    ...170 Mich.App. 1, 13, 427 N.W.2d 907 (1988), People v. Parker, 133 Mich.App. 358, 363, 349 N.W.2d 514 (1984), People v. McDonnel, 91 Mich.App. 458, 461, 283 N.W.2d 773 (1979), but defendant does not argue that this line of cases 29. See MCL 768.20a(2). 30. See People v. Carines, 460 Mich. 75......
  • People v. Lawson
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • June 8, 1983
    ...v. Hale, 99 Mich.App. 177, 297 N.W.2d 609 (1980). People v. Snyder, 108 Mich.App. 754, 310 N.W.2d 868 (1981), and People v. McDonnell, 91 Mich.App. 458, 283 N.W.2d 773 (1979), lv. den. 407 Mich. 938 (1979), are distinguishable. They held that a defendant had been deprived of the effective a......
  • People v. Shahideh
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • October 25, 2007
    ...170 Mich.App. 1, 13, 427 N.W.2d 907 (1988); People v. Parker, 133 Mich.App. 358, 363, 349 N.W.2d 514 (1984); People v. McDonnel, 91 Mich.App. 458, 461, 283 N.W.2d 773 (1979). The Michigan Constitution and the United States Constitution guarantee criminal defendants the right to the effectiv......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT