People v. McRae

• Decision Date: 01 November 1999
• Citation: 266 A.D.2d 241,696 N.Y.S.2d 903
• Parties: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>SHALLICKE McRAE, Also Known as YUHURA McCRAY, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

266 A.D.2d 241

696 N.Y.S.2d 903

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v.SHALLICKE McRAE, Also Known as YUHURA McCRAY, Appellant.

Decided November 1, 1999.

Mangano, P. J., O'Brien, Ritter and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court's Allen charge (see, Allen v United States, 164 US 492) was coercive is not preserved for appellate review since he did not raise a specific objection on that ground before the trial court (see, People v Ramkisson, 245 AD2d 393). In any event, read as a whole, the court's Allen charge was proper (see, People v Cowen, 249 AD2d 560).

The defendant's remaining arguments are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit (see, People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172; People v Kovzelove, 242 AD2d 477; People v Campbell, 228 AD2d 689; People v Okafore, 72 NY2d 81; People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).