People v. Mosquera

• Citation: 156 A.D.3d 728,64 N.Y.S.3d 914 (Mem)
• Decision Date: 13 December 2017
• Docket Number: 2014–08722,Ind. No. 13–00195
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Emerson Pareja MOSQUERA, appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court Appellate Division

156 A.D.3d 728

64 N.Y.S.3d 914 (Mem)

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,

v.Emerson Pareja MOSQUERA, appellant.

2014–08722

Ind. No. 13–00195

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted – November 15, 2017

December 13, 2017

James D. Licata, New City, N.Y. (Ellen O'Hara Woods of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered September 9, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Muniz, 91 N.Y.2d 570, 575, 673 N.Y.S.2d 358, 696 N.E.2d 182 ) precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 9, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 ).

DILLON, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.