People v. Nicometi

Decision Date09 May 1963
Citation191 N.E.2d 79,12 N.Y.2d 428,240 N.Y.S.2d 589
Parties, 191 N.E.2d 79 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Patricia NICOMETI, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Herald P. Fahringer, Buffalo, for appellant.

Carman F. Ball, Dist. Atty. (Dewey E. Ertell, Jr., Buffalo, of counsel), for respondent.

FOSTER, Judge.

The primary issue on this appeal is whether lack of jurisdiction in a Court of Special Sessions can now be raised on appeal to this court from a judgment of conviction, where such an allegation was not specifically raised in appellant's affidavit of errors or argued to the intermediate appellate court.

Appellant was charged with: (1) the misdemeanor of assault in the third degree (Penal Law, § 244, subd. 1); (2) the offense of disorderly conduct (Penal Law, § 722, subd. 2); and (3) the misdemeanor of resisting arrest (Penal Law, § 1825). Trial was had in the Justice's Court of the Town of Aurora; the jury brought in a verdict of not guilty to the first two above-mentioned charges, but guilty of the charge of resisting arrest. To perfect her appeal, appellant submitted an affidavit of errors alleging grounds for reversal (Code of Criminal Procedure, § 751), none of which specifically raise the question of jurisdiction of the Justice's Court, other than perhaps: 'The information was insufficient as a matter of law.' On her appeal to the Erie County Court, the judgment of conviction was affirmed.

Raised specifically for the first time is the contention that judgment must now be reversed because the Justice's Court of the Town of Aurora did not have jurisdiction to hear and adjudicate a violation of section 1825 of the Penal Law. This court, as a Court of Special Sessions in the counties other than those within the City of New York, has jurisdiction to hear and determine charges only as specified in section 56 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see N.Y.Const., art. VI, § 17; Town Law, § 31). There are many subdivisions to this section, of which all but the following 2 list specific offenses (resisting arrest is not included) triable in Courts of Special Sessions:

'37. Such other jurisdiction as is now provided by special statute or municipal ordinance authorized by statute.

'38. When a complaint is made to or a warrant is issued by a committing magistrate for any misdemeanor not included in the foregoing subdivisions of this section, if the accused shall elect to be tried by a court of special sessions, as provided by section two hundred and eleven. But this subdivision shall not apply to any misdemeanor which is, or may be punishable by a fine exceeding fifty dollars, or by imprisonment exceeding six months.'

As the People now concede, the Justice's Court of the Town of Aurora does not have jurisdiction by any special statute or ordinance to try a violation of section 1825 of the Penal Law. A violation of said section, the misdemeanor of resisting arrest, is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 or not more than one year's imprisonment, or by both (Penal Law, § 1937).

It seems clear that the Justice's Court had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the misdemeanor upon which appellant was convicted (People v. Kischel, 276 N.Y. 116, 11 N.E.2d 559). Such a defect requires a reversal of the conviction, for it is certain that a defect in jurisdiction can never be waived (see, e. g., People v. Scott, 3 N.Y.2d 148, 152, 164 N.Y.S.2d 707, 710, 143 N.E.2d 901, 903).

The People, however, contend that, since an appeal from a Court of Special Sessions may only be taken by filing an affidavit of errors pursuant to section 751 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the appeal must be limited to those errors specifically raised in such an affidavit (see, e. g., People v. Klein, 7 N.Y.2d 264, 266, 196 N.Y.S.2d 964, 966, 164 N.E.2d 845, 847; People v. Prior, 4 N.Y.2d 70, 73, 172 N.Y.S.2d 155, 156, 149 N.E.2d 83, 84; People v. Giles, 152 N.Y. 136,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • People v. Ventura, 2004 NY Slip Op 50468(U) (NY 5/6/2004)
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 6, 2004
    ...Courts of Nassau County do not, in this Court's opinion, have jurisdiction over felonies or misdemeanors. People v. Nicometi, 12 N.Y.2d 428, 240 N.Y.S.2d 589, 191 N.E.2d 79 (1963) and People v. Brodlowicz, 182 Misc. 351, 48 N.Y.S.2d 86 (1944). This Court cannot feasibly comply with the Stat......
  • People v. Sutton
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 5, 1984
    ... ... It does not apply to the improper submission of noninclusory offenses since subject matter jurisdiction of the court [99 A.D.2d 366] may not be waived by the accused (see People v. Nicometi, 12 NY2d 428, 430-431 [240 N.Y.S.2d 589, 191 N.E.2d 79]; People v. Scott, 3 NY2d 148, 153 [164 N.Y.S.2d 707, 143 N.E.2d 901], supra; People v. Harper, 37 NY2d 96 [371 N.Y.S.2d 467, 332 N.E.2d 336],supra )." ...         The Court of Appeals affirmed, stating that "[p]etitioner's detention ... ...
  • People v. Whitaker
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 2015
    ...(see, e. g., People v. Scott, 3 NY2d 148, 152, 164 N.Y.S.2d 707, 710, 143 N.E.2d 901, 903)." (People v. Nicometi, 12 NY2d 428, 431, 240 N.Y.S.2d 589, 591, 191 N.E.2d 79, 80[1963]). Thus, "[t]he commencement of a criminal action requires that the criminal conduct bear a necessary nexus to th......
  • People v. Vaughn
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 6, 2019
    ...thus jurisdictionally defective. Initially, a claim of lack of jurisdiction may be raised at any time (see generally People v. Nicometi, 12 N.Y.2d 428, 431, 240 N.Y.S.2d 589, 191 N.E.2d 79 [1963] ), and such challenge is not precluded by defendant's guilty plea or his waiver of the right to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT