People v. Peek, 79SA223

Decision Date10 December 1979
Docket NumberNo. 79SA223,79SA223
Citation199 Colo. 3,604 P.2d 23
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith William PEEK and Michael Clyde Peek, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

John Anderson, Dist. Atty., Eleventh Judicial District, Canon City, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Shelley Gilman, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendants-appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the district attorney on a question of law, section 16-12-102, C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The defendants were not brought to trial within the six months that followed their arraignment, and an interpretation of the speedy trial provisions, section 18-1-405(1), C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8) and Crim.P. 48 is the sole issue before us.

It is the burden of the prosecution and the trial court to comply with the requirements of both the speedy trial statute and rule. People v. Colantonio, 196 Colo. 242, 583 P.2d 919 (1978); People v. Lopez, 41 Colo.App. 206, 587 P.2d 792 (1978). The defendants did not waive their right to a speedy trial and their motion to dismiss was properly granted. Harrington v. District Court, 192 Colo. 351, 559 P.2d 225 (1977); Tasset v. Yeager, 195 Colo. 190, 576 P.2d 558 (1978).

Accordingly, we affirm.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Bell, 82SA255
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • September 26, 1983
    ...rests with the district attorney and with the trial court to insure that the time limits of section 18-1-405 are met. People v. Peek, 199 Colo. 3, 604 P.2d 23 (1979); People v. Colantonio, 196 Colo. 242, 583 P.2d 919 The second theory advanced by the People is that the delay in bringing the......
  • People v. Deason
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • October 17, 1983
    ...People v. Colantonio, 196 Colo. 242, 243, 244, 583 P.2d 919, 921 (1978). Accord People v. Bell, supra; People v. Peek, 199 Colo. 3, 604 P.2d 23 (1979) (per curiam). B. Relying on People v. Haines, 37 Colo.App. 302, 549 P.2d 786 (1976), the People claim that the commencement of the sanity tr......
  • People v. Moye, 80SA265
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1981
    ...and judicial delays to a pending criminal proceeding. See generally Marquez v. District Court, Colo., 613 P.2d 1302 (1980); People v. Peek, Colo., 604 P.2d 23 (1979); People v. Murphy, 183 Colo. 106, 515 P.2d 107 (1973); Jaramillo v. District Court, 174 Colo. 561, 484 P.2d 1219 (1971). The ......
  • Wesson v. Bowling, 79SA462
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • December 17, 1979
1 books & journal articles
  • Rule 48 NUMBER OF JURORS.
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure (CBA)
    • Invalid date
    ...for the defendant to have the cause tried by a jury of three. Branch v. Branch, 30 Colo. 499, 71 P. 632 (1903). Applied in People v. Peek, 199 Colo. 3, 604 P.2d 23 (1979); People v. Boos, 199 Colo. 15, 604 P.2d 272...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT