People v. Perez
| Decision Date | 22 January 1998 |
| Citation | 667 N.Y.S.2d 244,246 A.D.2d 448 |
| Parties | 1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 507 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sergio PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ellen Sue Handman, for respondent.
Richard M. Weinstein, for defendant-appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered October 31, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 17 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant did not preserve his current claims that the court should have struck certain identification testimony on the ground of the People's alleged failure to provide notice pursuant to CPL 710.30(1)(b), or that the previous Wade hearing should have been reopened. In this connection, defendant may not rely upon an objection entered by counsel for the codefendant (People v. Buckley, 75 N.Y.2d 843, 552 N.Y.S.2d 912, 552 N.E.2d 160).
The court's Sandoval ruling permitting the prosecutor to elicit defendant's prior robbery conviction, a matter highly relevant to credibility, was an appropriate exercise of discretion (People v. Reid, 190 A.D.2d 575, 593 N.Y.S.2d 521, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 1078, 601 N.Y.S.2d 598, 619 N.E.2d 676).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Perez v. Greiner
...purposes. (Def. App. Br. at 20-22).3 On January 22, 1998, the Appellate Division affirmed Mr. Perez's conviction. People v. Perez, 246 A.D.2d 448, 667 N.Y.S.2d 244 (1st Dep't 1998). It held that Mr. Perez had not preserved at trial his claims concerning the identification testimony, and it ......
- People v. Perez