People v. Perry

Decision Date24 March 2009
Docket Number2007-05241
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHAN PERRY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court erred in its pretrial ruling on the People's Molineux application is not properly before this Court as the defendant forfeited review of the Molineux ruling by virtue of his plea of guilty (see People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 [1901]; People v Graham, 261 AD2d 414 [1999]; People v Gerber, 182 AD2d 252, 260 [1992]; People v Winchenbaugh, 120 AD2d 811, 813 [1986]). Review is also precluded by the defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Graham, 261 AD2d 414 [1999]). The defendant's argument that he did not voluntarily enter his plea of guilty because it was coerced by an improper Molineux ruling is not preserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Thompson, 28 AD3d 498 [2006]). In any event, the record reflects that the defendant's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v Garcia, 92 NY2d 869, 870 [1998]; People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]).

Finally, the defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the hearing court's suppression determination (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Munford, 37 AD3d 855 [2007]; People v Smith, 35 AD3d 769 [2006]; People v Peoples, 34 AD3d 503 [2006]).

PRUDENTI, P.J., SKELOS, DILLON and ENG, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • People v. Chan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 13, 2012
    ...906, 690 N.Y.S.2d 501, 712 N.E.2d 668 [1999];People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160 [1995];People v. Perry, 60 A.D.3d 974, 874 N.Y.S.2d 916 [2009] ), and none of the exceptions to this rule are apparent on this record ( see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 ......
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 6, 2013
    ...these rulings by virtue of his plea of guilty ( see People v. Gerber, 182 A.D.2d 252, 260, 589 N.Y.S.2d 171;see also People v. Perry, 60 A.D.3d 974, 974, 874 N.Y.S.2d 916;People v. Condes, 23 A.D.3d 1149, 1150, 805 N.Y.S.2d 753;People v. Flythe, 190 A.D.2d 748, 594 N.Y.S.2d ...
  • People v. George
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 3, 2010
    ...of guilty was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant never moved to withdraw his plea ( see People v. Perry, 60 A.D.3d 974, 874 N.Y.S.2d 916; People v. Velazquez, 21 A.D.3d 388, 798 N.Y.S.2d 919). In any event, the contention is without merit ( see People v. Perry......
  • People v. Allen
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 1, 2011
    ...to the admissibility of certain evidence ( see People v. Campbell, 73 N.Y.2d 481, 486, 541 N.Y.S.2d 756, 539 N.E.2d 584; People v. Perry, 60 A.D.3d 974, 874 N.Y.S.2d 916; People v. Mead, 198 A.D.2d 612, 613, 603 N.Y.S.2d 925). To the extent the defendant contends that his plea was rendered ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT