People v. Pickens, 100824.

Decision Date29 November 2007
Docket Number100824.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JODI PICKENS, Also Known as JODI PARKER, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene County (Pulver, Jr., J.), rendered December 19, 2006, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Peters, J.

Defendant was indicted for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, based upon her sale of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer. Defendant subsequently pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in full satisfaction of the indictment, as well as in satisfaction of certain outstanding charges and an ongoing investigation concerning defendant's unauthorized use of her mother's credit card. Sentencing was adjourned for one year with the understanding that defendant was to complete a long-term residential drug and alcohol treatment program. After completing this program, defendant was to be sentenced to time served plus five years of probation. However, it was also understood that if defendant failed to complete the rehabilitation program, she may be sentenced to a prison term of up to 5½ years.

Three months after entering the rehabilitation program, defendant was discharged for violating program rules. Based on defendant's failure to complete the rehabilitation program, County Court found her in violation of her plea agreement and sentenced her to a term of 5½ years in prison, with two years of postrelease supervision, and ordered her to pay restitution of $848.33 based on her unauthorized use of her mother's credit card. Defendant now appeals.

Defendant initially contends that there was insufficient evidence that she violated the plea agreement. We disagree. County Court held a hearing where evidence was presented that defendant had violated program rules, including, among other things, testing positive for opiates and having beer hidden in her luggage. Therefore, we find that County Court's inquiry was sufficient to support the conclusion that defendant had failed to successfully complete the long-term rehabilitation program and had violated the plea agreement (see People v Valencia, 3...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Naumowicz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 12, 2010
    ...claims in the interest of justice and resentence defendant within the agreed-upon range ( see Penal Law § 60.27[1]; People v. Pickens, 45 A.D.3d 1187, 1188, 846 N.Y.S.2d 469 [2007], lvs. denied 10 N.Y.3d 769, 854 N.Y.S.2d 331, 883 N.E.2d 1266 [2008] ).3907 N.Y.S.2d 357 On the other hand, th......
  • People v. Galietta
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 8, 2010
    ...v. Gantt, 63 A.D.3d at 1380, 881 N.Y.S.2d 224; People v. Armstead, 52 A.D.3d 966, 967-968, 859 N.Y.S.2d 506 [2008]; People v. Pickens, 45 A.D.3d 1187, 1188, 846 N.Y.S.2d 469 [2007], lvs. denied904 N.Y.S.2d 80610 N.Y.3d 769, 854 N.Y.S.2d 331, 883 N.E.2d 1266 [2008] ). Therefore, defendant's ......
  • People v. Strong
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 15, 2015
    ...the imposition of the promised sentence (see People v. Culcleasure, 75 A.D.3d at 833, 905 N.Y.S.2d 682 ; People v. Pickens, 45 A.D.3d 1187, 1188, 846 N.Y.S.2d 469 [2007], lvs. denied 10 N.Y.3d 769, 854 N.Y.S.2d 331, 883 N.E.2d 1266 [2008] ). Moreover, the People concede, and we agree, that ......
  • People v. Perkins
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 11, 2015
    ...68 A.D.3d 1542, 1544, 893 N.Y.S.2d 649 [2009], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 799, 899 N.Y.S.2d 133, 925 N.E.2d 937 [2010] ; People v. Pickens, 45 A.D.3d 1187, 1188, 846 N.Y.S.2d 469 [2007], lvs. denied 10 N.Y.3d 769, 854 N.Y.S.2d 331, 883 N.E.2d 1266 [2008] ). His challenge to the adequacy of the in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT