People v. Pierce

Decision Date27 January 2000
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>CHARLES F. PIERCE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

Mercure, J. P.

The sole contention advanced on appeal is that the jury's verdict finding defendant guilty of driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3) is against the weight of the evidence. We disagree and accordingly affirm.

In our view, the experienced police officers' testimony as to the manner in which defendant drove his vehicle, particularly his excessive speed, weaving within his lane and initial refusal to yield to the officers' lights or siren, and his appearance and conduct, including evidence of defendant's glassy eyes and the strong odor of an alcoholic beverage, defendant's failure of or outright refusal to perform field dexterity tests, refusal to submit to a chemical test, unsteady gait and erratic behavior, provided abundant evidentiary support for the jury's determination (see, People v Hasenflue, 252 AD2d 829, lv denied 92 NY2d 982; People v D'Angelo, 244 AD2d 788, lv denied 91 NY2d 890; People v Bowers, 201 AD2d 830, lv denied 83 NY2d 909). Thus, viewing the evidence in a neutral light, "we conclude that the jury's finding that defendant voluntarily consumed alcohol to the extent that he was incapable to a substantial extent of employing the physical and mental abilities necessary to operate his vehicle in a reasonable and careful manner is not against the weight of the evidence" (People v D'Angelo, supra, at 789; see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; People v Cruz, 48 NY2d 419, 427-428, appeal dismissed 446 US 901).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Wilson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 8, 2011
  • People v. Carota
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 29, 2012
    ...N.Y.S.2d 625, 399 N.E.2d 513 [1979], appeal dismissed 446 U.S. 901, 100 S.Ct. 1825, 64 L.Ed.2d 254 [1980]; see People v. Pierce, 268 A.D.2d 883, 883, 704 N.Y.S.2d 160 [2000], lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 924, 708 N.Y.S.2d 363, 729 N.E.2d 1162 [2000]; People v. Hagmann, 175 A.D.2d 502, 504, 572 N.Y.......
  • People v. Sines, 107014
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 11, 2015
    ...104 A.D.3d 603, 604, 961 N.Y.S.2d 166 [2013], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 947, 968 N.Y.S.2d 9, 990 N.E.2d 143 [2013] ; People v. Pierce, 268 A.D.2d 883, 704 N.Y.S.2d 160 [2000], lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 924, 708 N.Y.S.2d 363, 729 N.E.2d 1162 [2000] ; People v. Gelster, 256 A.D.2d 1133, 1133, 684 N.Y.S......
  • People v. Marek
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 8, 2001
    ...finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law 1192 [3]) is against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Pierce, 268 A.D.2d 883, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 924; People v D'Angelo, 244 A.D.2d 788, 789, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 890). The sentence is not unduly harsh or Judg......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT