People v. Pierre
| Decision Date | 02 February 2007 |
| Docket Number | KA 03-02059. |
| Citation | 2007 NY Slip Op 00922,37 A.D.3d 1172,829 N.Y.S.2d 386 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES R. PIERRE, Also Known as TEDDY PIERRE, Appellant. |
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered July 28, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree (two counts) and arson in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by reversing that part convicting defendant of murder in the second degree under count two of the indictment and dismissing that count of the indictment and as modified the judgment is affirmed.
Memorandum:On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [viii]; [b]), two counts of murder in the second degree (§ 125.25 [1]) and one count of arson in the second degree (§ 150.15), defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based upon testimony elicited from a police officer. The officer referred to defendant's "past history," but there was no testimony concerning defendant's criminal history. There was also no testimony concerning a polygraph procedure because the court sustained defense counsel's objection to that testimony before it was elicited. Although the officer's testimony with respect to the invocation by defendant of his right to counsel was improper (see People v Nicholas, 286 AD2d 861, 862 [2001], affd 98 NY2d 749 [2002]), the court immediately sustained defendant's objection to that testimony, instructed the jury to disregard it, and offered to give a further curative instruction (see People v Shaffer, 223 AD2d 755, 755-756 [1996], lv denied 87 NY2d 1025 [1996]). We thus conclude that no prejudice to defendant resulted from the officer's testimony and the court properly denied defendant's motion for a mistrial.
Defendant did not object to the opinion testimony of a fire investigator that the fire was intentionally set, and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the testimony improperly invaded the province of the jury (see People v Tutt, 305 AD2d 987 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 588 [2003]). In any event, we conclude that any error in the admission of that testimony is harmless (see People v Narrod, 23 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2005], lv...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Taylor
...320 N.Y.S.2d 977 [3d Dept. 1971], affd 30 N.Y.2d 592, 330 N.Y.S.2d 803, 281 N.E.2d 849 [1972] ; see also People v. Pierre, 37 A.D.3d 1172, 1173, 829 N.Y.S.2d 386 [4th Dept. 2007], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 989, 838 N.Y.S.2d 492, 869 N.E.2d 668 [2007] ), it appears that the defendants in those case......
-
People v. Clayton
...in the second degree must be dismissed as a lesser included count of murder in the first degree (see CPL 300.40[3][b] ; People v. Pierre, 37 A.D.3d 1172, 1173, 829 N.Y.S.2d 386 [4th Dept. 2007], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 989, 838 N.Y.S.2d 492, 869 N.E.2d 668 [2007]). Therefore, we modify the judgm......
-
People v. Hicks
...testimony about defendant's intent to sell cocaine improperly usurped the jury's fact-finding role is unpreserved (see People v. Pierre, 37 A.D.3d 1172, 1173, 829 N.Y.S.2d 386 [4th Dept. 2007], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 989, 838 N.Y.S.2d 492, 869 N.E.2d 668 [2007] ). In any event, any error in per......
-
People v. Borden
...were sufficient to alleviate any prejudice to defendant as a result of the detective's unsolicited testimony ( see People v. Pierre, 37 A.D.3d 1172, 829 N.Y.S.2d 386, lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 989, 838 N.Y.S.2d 492, 869 N.E.2d 668; see also People v. Nicholas, 286 A.D.2d 861, 862, 731 N.Y.S.2d 99......