People v. Portelli
| Decision Date | 11 March 1965 |
| Citation | 205 N.E.2d 857,15 N.Y.2d 235,257 N.Y.S.2d 931 |
| Parties | , 205 N.E.2d 857 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony PORTELLI and Jerome Rosenberg, Appellants. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
William Sonenshine and Gustave H. Newman, Brooklyn, for Anthony Portelli, appellant.
Maurice Edelbaum, New York City, for Jerome Rosenberg, appellant.
Aaron E. Koota, Dist. Atty. (Aaron Nussbaum, Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.
The proof adduced upon the trial is more than sufficient to support the jury's verdict that the defendants are guilty of felony murder and, since we find no errors of law, we would have no occasion to write were it not for the testimony of police brutality which the record before us contains.
On May 18, 1962 two police officers, Detectives Luke Fallon and John Finnegan, were shot and killed in Brooklyn during the course of a holdup when they sought to apprehend the robbers. Upon the trial, held in January of 1963, one of the principal witnesses against the defendant Portelli was a small-time criminal by the name of Richard Melville. Called by the People, he testified that the defendant Portelli came to his home (with two other men) on May 20 and completely implicated himself in the homicides, describing how he participated in the robbery, how he shot the police officers and how he managed to get away. On cross-examination, Melville stated that later the same day several detectives took him to a police station for questioning and that, although he first denied knowing Portelli or anything about the crime, he finally told the police the story which he gave in court. But he declared that he did so only after he had been held in custody overnight and severely beaten and tortured and that he would not have talked to the police had they not coerced him in this manner. However, he insisted from the witness stand that the pretrial statement, which he made to the police, as well as his testimony, implicating Portelli was completely true.
It is the defendants' contention that the witness' testimony should have been stricken once it appeared that his statement, although given some eight months before the trial, had been coerced by the police.
Although we deprecate official lawlessness with all the emphasis at our command, we do not believe that such conduct warrants a holding that Melville's testimony should have been stricken and excluded from the record. Testimony given from the witness stand by a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Smith
...potential witness under interrogation for the purpose of securing a statement incriminating a third party. People v. Portelli, 15 N.Y.2d 235, 205 N.E.2d 857, 257 N.Y.S.2d 931 (1965)." 384 U.S. at 446, 86 S.Ct. at 1613 (footnote It is not the purpose of this opinion to argue with Miranda v. ......
-
Oregon v. Elstad
...Wakat v. Harlib, 253 F.2d 59 (CA7 1958); People v. La Frana, 4 Ill.2d 261, 122 N.E.2d 583 (1954); cf. People v. Portelli, 15 N.Y.2d 235, 205 N.E.2d 857, 257 N.Y.S.2d 931 (1965) (potential witness tortured by police). Such custodial interrogation is, of course, closer to that employed by the......
-
Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera v. State of New York Westover v. United States State of California v. Stewart 8212 761, 584
...potential witness under interrogation for the purpose of securing a statement incriminating a third party. People v. Portelli, 15 N.Y.2d 235, 257 N.Y.S.2d 931, 205 N.E.2d 857 (1965).7 The examples given above are undoubtedly the exception now, but they are sufficiently widespread to be the ......
-
State v. Wolery
...officers had threatened, cursed, and frightened him.Cf. United States v. Wolfe (C.A.7, 1962), 307 F.2d 798; People v. Portelli (1965), 15 N.Y.2d 235, 257 N.Y.S.2d 931, 205 N.E.2d 857, certiorari denied (1966), 382 U.S. 1009, 86 S.Ct. 612, 15 L.Ed.2d 524. In Portelli, the New York Court of A......
-
Mitya Karamazov Gives the Supreme Court an Onion: the Role of Confessions
...496 (Md. 1957) (defendant was stripped naked and police indicated that they would take skin and hair from his body); People v. Portelli, 205 N.E.2d 857, 858 (N.Y. 1965) (suspect was beaten and tortured until he gave an incriminating confession); see generally Steven Penney, Theories of Conf......
-
A Deep Breath Before the Plunge: Undoing Miranda's Failure Before It's Too Late - Benjamin D. Cunningham
...Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 596-97 (1896)). 48. Id. at 445. 49. Id. 50. Id. at 445-46. 51. Id. at 446 & nn. 5-7 (citing New York v. Portelli, 205 N.E.2d 857 (N.Y. 1965)). 52. Id. at 447-48 (quoting IV National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, Report on Lawlessness in Law Enforcement ......