People v. Porter
| Decision Date | 15 November 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 136.,136. |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony R. PORTER, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant's motion to suppress statements granted and a new trial ordered.
Whether a particular request for counsel is equivocal presents a mixed question of law and fact. When there is support in the record for the Appellate Division's determination of a mixed question of law and fact, the issue is beyond further review by this Court. Here, however, there is no support in the record for the determination that defendant's request for counsel was equivocal. To the contrary, the only evidence—defendant's words "I think I need an attorney," coupled with the interviewing officer's notation that defendant was "asking for an attorney"—demonstrates an unequivocal invocation of defendant's right to counsel. This is not to say that utterance of the words defendant used would unequivocally invoke the right to counsel in every instance. But on this record, where there were no additional facts upon which a contrary inference could be drawn, further inquiry by the police was not permitted. Defendant's confession, made after police questioning continued, must therefore be suppressed.
Finally, the Appellate Division's finding that the police had consent to search the premises where defendant was located has support in the record and is thus beyond our review.
Order reversed, etc.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Harris
...statement to the police officer regarding an attorney constituted a request for counsel” ( id.). [93 A.D.3d 68] In People v. Porter, 9 N.Y.3d 966, 848 N.Y.S.2d 583, 878 N.E.2d 998, the defendant said, “I think I need an attorney,” and the interviewing officer wrote, in his notes, that the d......
-
People v. Guerra
...demeanor, manner of expression and the particular words found to have been used by the defendant." Id. at 1056; People v Porter, 9 N.Y.3d 966 [2007]. The Court must employ an objective standard in evaluating a defendant's statements, namely whether a "reasonable police officer should have u......
-
State v. Turner
...... 305 SW 3d 515 . nature of a request for counsel as purely a question of fact. See, e.g., People v. Porter, 9 N.Y.3d 966, 848 N.Y.S.2d 583, 878 N.E.2d 998, 999 (2007); State v. Dumas, 750 A.2d 420, 425 (R.I.2000); Commonwealth v. Redmond, ......
-
People v. Sierra
...N.E.2d 95). Inasmuch as the record establishes that defendant made an unequivocal request for counsel ( see generally People v. Porter, 9 N.Y.3d 966, 967, 848 N.Y.S.2d 583, 878 N.E.2d 998), we address that contention here ( see McLean, 15 N.Y.3d at 119, 121, 905 N.Y.S.2d 536, 931 N.E.2d 520......
-
An empirical study of the vindicated dissents of the New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, from 2000 to 2010.
...N.Y.3d 218, 885 N.E.2d 176, 855 N.Y.S.2d 412 (2008); People v. Porter, 37 A.D.3d 1165, 829 N.Y.S.2d 305 (App. Div. 4th Dep't 2007), rev'd, 9 N.Y.3d 966, 878 N.E.2d 998, 848 N.Y.S.2d 583 (2007); In re Eighth Judicial Dist. Asbestos Litig., 32 A.D.3d 1268, 822 N.Y.S.2d 216 (App. Div. 4th Dep'......