People v. Rance

Decision Date31 May 1996
Citation227 A.D.2d 936,644 N.Y.S.2d 447
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Katherine A. RANCE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Linda S. Reynolds by Robert Hallborg, Jr., Buffalo, for appellant.

Kevin M. Dillon by Raymond Herman, Buffalo, for respondent.

Before DENMAN, P.J., and PINE, FALLON, BALIO and BOEHM, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

At approximately 2:50 P.M. on February 3, 1994, a Town of Tonawanda police officer received a radio dispatch that an anonymous informant had reported that an intoxicated woman was leaving a business establishment at 2690 Sheridan Drive, and was entering the driver's seat of a red Oldsmobile with a particular license plate number. The officer arrived at that address within minutes and observed a red Oldsmobile with that plate number backing out of a space in the parking lot. The officer pulled up behind the vehicle to block its path and then approached defendant, the driver, to request her license and registration. Defendant, the only person in the vehicle, said that her license had been suspended. She mumbled as she spoke and her eyes were "glassy and watery". The officer asked defendant to perform field sobriety tests, but defendant refused. She was thereafter arrested for driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree.

Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying her motion to suppress all evidence obtained by the police following the automobile stop, which defendant contends was unlawful. We disagree. The information in the radio dispatch provided reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant had committed or was about to commit a crime, thereby justifying a stop of the vehicle (see, People v. May, 81 N.Y.2d 725, 727, 593 N.Y.S.2d 760, 609 N.E.2d 113). Police action may be based upon information from an anonymous source where, as here, it relates to "matters gravely affecting personal or public safety" (People v. Taggart, 20 N.Y.2d 335, 343, 283 N.Y.S.2d 1, 229 N.E.2d 581, mot. to amend remittitur granted, 21 N.Y.2d 729, 287 N.Y.S.2d 695, 234 N.E.2d 714, rearg. denied 21 N.Y.2d 774, 288 N.Y.S.2d 1029, 235 N.E.2d 228, appeal dismissed, 392 U.S. 667, 88 S.Ct. 2317, 20 L.Ed.2d 1360; cf., People v. Burpee, 175 A.D.2d 585, 572 N.Y.S.2d 250, lv. denied, 79 N.Y.2d 825, 580 N.Y.S.2d 205, 588 N.E.2d 103).

We reject defendant's further contention that the court erred in failing to conduct a hearing to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • McChesney v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 20 Octubre 1999
    ...State ex rel. Taxation & Revenue Dep't v. Van Ruiten, 107 N.M. 536, 760 P.2d 1302, 1304-05 (Ct.App. 1988); People v. Rance, 227 A.D.2d 936, 644 N.Y.S.2d 447, 447 (1996); State v. Bryl, 477 N.W.2d 814, 817 (N.D.1991); Rittman v. State, 875 P.2d 439, 441 (Okla.Ct.App.1994); State v. Perrin, 1......
  • People v. Wells
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 26 Junio 2006
    ...1041-1046; State v. Sampson (Me.1996) 669 A.2d 1326; State v. Melanson (1995) 140 N.H. 199, 665 A.2d 338, 339-341; People v. Rance (1996) 227 A.D.2d 936, 644 N.Y.S.2d 447; Kaysville City v. Mulcahy (Utah Ct.App.1997) 943 P.2d 231; State v. Boyea (2000) 171 Vt. 401, 765 A.2d 862, 867-868.) W......
  • State v. Boyea
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • 1 Diciembre 2000
    ...did not have to observe erratic behavior "to stop the defendant and investigate this exigent circumstance"); People v. Rance, 227 A.D.2d 936, 644 N.Y.S.2d 447, 447 (1996) (police stop of reportedly intoxicated driver "may be based upon information from an anonymous source where, as here, it......
  • U.S. v. Wheat
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 28 Diciembre 2001
    ...also State v. Markus, 478 N.W.2d 405 (Iowa Ct.App. 1991); State v. Smith, 638 N.E.2d 1353 (Ind.Ct.App.1994); People v. Rance, 644 N.Y.S.2d 447, 227 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y.App. Div.1996); Kaysville City v. Mulcahy, 943 P.2d 231 (Utah Ct.App.1997). But see McChesney v. State, 988 P.2d 1071, 1075-78 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT