People v. Richardson, Cr. 2628

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtBRAY; PETERS, P.J., and WARD
Citation213 P.2d 734,95 Cal.App.2d 703
PartiesPEOPLE v. RICHARDSON.
Docket NumberCr. 2628
Decision Date26 January 1950

Page 734

213 P.2d 734
95 Cal.App.2d 703
PEOPLE

v.
RICHARDSON.
Cr. 2628.
District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.
Jan. 26, 1950.

Page 735

[95 Cal.App.2d 704] David Richardson, in propria persona, for appellant.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

BRAY, Justice.

Defendant and one Stocker were tried on, and convicted by a jury of, the charge of violation of section 211 of the Penal Code (robbery). Three prior convictions were admitted by Stocker. Two prior convictions were charged against defendant, which he denied. One of these was dismissed. The jury found that defendant had suffered the other conviction. From the judgment entered on the jury verdict (the court fixed the degree as second) defendant appealed. Stocker did not appeal.

Grounds of Appeal.

Defendant appears in propria persona and it is difficult to determine exactly the points he desired to raise. Apparently his grounds of appeal are: (1) alleged insufficiency of the evidence; (2) prior conviction claimed not binding upon him because of minority; (3) claimed matters outside the record prove his innocence; (4) he was not represented by counsel at trial.

1. Evidence Sufficient.

Primarily, defendant contends the evidence against him was perjured, contradictory, mistaken and untrue. We have carefully examined the transcript of the evidence. It fully and completely supports the conviction. Obviously, the veracity of the witnesses was a matter for the jury to determine, rather than this court.

The evidence for the prosecution was as follows: On the evening of June 15, 1949, at about 9:15, Edward Hanson, a clerical employee of the Union Oil Company, 425 Front Street, and a resident of Menlo Park, left the office of his employer to walk to the Third and Townsend Depot of the Southern Pacific Railroad to catch the 9:45 p.m. train. As he passed the entrance to a hotel at 574 Third Street (between Bryant and Brannan, on the west side of Third) he saw Stocker, who grabbed him by the arm and forced him into the doorway of the hotel. There he encountered defendant, who grabbed him, removed his watch, and, with Stocker, pulled him into the hallway of the hotel. While Stocker held him defendant struck him and caused him to fall to the floor. Defendant then went through Hanson's pockets, took his wallet and two $1 bills. The wallet contained no money, but did contain [95 Cal.App.2d 705] various identification cards, receipts, and a pay voucher for $670.60, payable to

Page 736

Hanson. They then released Hanson who ran into the street, while defendant and Stocker went up the stairs of the hotel, through the hallway, and a rear exit.

Special Officer Scott appeared, in uniform, and Hanson reported what had happened. Scott told Hanson to stay in front of the building and went into the building toward the rear. When Scott was in the hotel he heard the rear door close. Following the sound, he went out the rear door onto Ritch Street (west of Third, running parallel to it). As he did so he observed two men (Stocker and defendant) going on a "dog trot" down Ritch toward Bryant. They stopped near Bryant, adjacent to a vacant lot on which some shrubbery was growing. Scott observed the two men going through some papers which they threw over a small fence into the vacant lot and on top of a bush. He made himself known to them, and placed them under arrest. As he did so, defendant threw two crumpled pieces of paper to the ground. Scott searched them briefly, to see that they were not carrying weapons, handcuffed them to each other, and took them back to Hanson....

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • People v. Walton, B195084 (Cal. App. 11/1/2007), B195084
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • November 1, 2007
    ...pages 225-232 was not raised in the trial court, and we will not consider it for the first time on appeal. (People v. Richardson (1950) 95 Cal.App.2d 703, 706 [claimed error not raised at trial or in motion for new trial will not be considered on appeal].) In any event, Albarran is clearly ......
  • People v. Sparks, B206857 (Cal. App. 6/23/2009), B206857.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 23, 2009
    ...21, 25 [new grounds for granting new trial "may not be presented for the first time on appeal"]; People v. Richardson (1950) 95 Cal.App.2d 703, 706 [allegations of juror misconduct would not be considered on appeal when not raised during trial or in motion for new trial]; see gene......
  • People v. Pearson, Cr. 3272
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • May 14, 1957
    ...counsel from the Public Defender's office available to defendants acting in propria persona was approved in People v. Richardson, 95 Cal.App.2d 703, 707, 213 P.2d Concerning the request to be taken to the law library for 15 hours of research, the record is silent. Points that have no founda......
3 cases
  • People v. Walton, B195084 (Cal. App. 11/1/2007), B195084
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • November 1, 2007
    ...pages 225-232 was not raised in the trial court, and we will not consider it for the first time on appeal. (People v. Richardson (1950) 95 Cal.App.2d 703, 706 [claimed error not raised at trial or in motion for new trial will not be considered on appeal].) In any event, Albarran is clearly ......
  • People v. Sparks, B206857 (Cal. App. 6/23/2009), B206857.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 23, 2009
    ...21, 25 [new grounds for granting new trial "may not be presented for the first time on appeal"]; People v. Richardson (1950) 95 Cal.App.2d 703, 706 [allegations of juror misconduct would not be considered on appeal when not raised during trial or in motion for new trial]; see gene......
  • People v. Pearson, Cr. 3272
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • May 14, 1957
    ...counsel from the Public Defender's office available to defendants acting in propria persona was approved in People v. Richardson, 95 Cal.App.2d 703, 707, 213 P.2d Concerning the request to be taken to the law library for 15 hours of research, the record is silent. Points that have no founda......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT