People v. Roberson
| Decision Date | 14 April 1989 |
| Citation | 540 N.Y.S.2d 60,149 A.D.2d 926 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herbert ROBERSON, Jr., Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
A.J. Bosman Moore, Holland Patent, for appellant.
Paul Carbonaro, Auburn, for respondent.
Before DILLON, P.J., and DENMAN, BOOMER, GREEN and LAWTON, JJ.
Defendant, an inmate at Auburn Correctional Facility, entered a plea of guilty to the crime of promoting prison contraband in the first degree. In the brief filed by counsel, it is argued that defendant was denied his statutory right to appear and testify before the Grand Jury (CPL 190.50[5][a] ), and that his due process and equal protection rights were thus violated. It is also argued that the passage of approximately 11 months between the date of the crime and the date of the indictment effectively denied defendant due process of law. We find no merit to these claims. By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his right to raise the issue of whether he was entitled to notice of the Grand Jury proceeding (see, People v. Taylor, 65 N.Y.2d 1, 489 N.Y.S.2d 152, 478 N.E.2d 755; People v. Grey, 135 A.D.2d 1031, 522 N.Y.S.2d 965; People v. Ferrara, 99 A.D.2d 257, 472 N.Y.S.2d 407). In any event, he was not entitled to such notice since he had not "been arraigned in a local criminal court upon a currently undisposed of felony complaint charging an offense which is a subject of the prospective or pending grand jury proceeding" (CPL 190.50[5][a]; see, People v. Grey, supra; People v. LaBounty, 127 A.D.2d 989, 512 N.Y.S.2d 950, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 1005, 517 N.Y.S.2d 1039, 511 N.E.2d 98). We also conclude that defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial by the preindictment delay (see, People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 373 N.Y.S.2d 79, 335 N.E.2d 303).
Finally, we have reviewed each of the issues raised by defendant pro se, and we find that none has merit.
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Lasher
...e.g., People v. Smith, 168 A.D.2d 915, 564 N.Y.S.2d 884, lv. denied 77 N.Y.2d 911, 569 N.Y.S.2d 943, 572 N.E.2d 626; People v. Roberson, 149 A.D.2d 926, 540 N.Y.S.2d 60, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 746, 545 N.Y.S.2d 121, 543 N.E.2d 764; People v. Prest, 105 A.D.2d 1078, 1079, 482 N.Y.S.2d 172; Peo......
-
People v. Smith
...99 A.D.2d 257, 259, 472 N.Y.S.2d 407; see also, People v. Taylor, 65 N.Y.2d 1, 489 N.Y.S.2d 152, 478 N.E.2d 755; People v. Roberson, 149 A.D.2d 926, 540 N.Y.S.2d 60, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 746, 545 N.Y.S.2d 121, 543 N.E.2d 764; People v. Grey, 135 A.D.2d 1031, 1031-1032, 522 N.Y.S.2d 965; Peo......
- People v. Ballard
-
People v. Morgan
...(see, People v. Kelly, 198 A.D.2d 305, 604 N.Y.S.2d 821; People v. Roberts, 163 A.D.2d 68, 557 N.Y.S.2d 85; People v. Roberson, 149 A.D.2d 926, 540 N.Y.S.2d 60). There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the blood alcohol content test made more than two hours after the accident v......