People v. Robinson

Decision Date21 April 1994
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered February 28, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 10 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's request for new counsel was properly denied for failure to show good cause for a substitution (see, People v. Sawyer 57 N.Y.2d 12, 18-19, 453 N.Y.S.2d 418, 438 N.E.2d 1133, cert. denied 459 U.S. 1178, 103 S.Ct. 830, 74 L.Ed.2d 1024). Defendant's claim that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecutor's comments during summation vouching for the credibility of the People's witnesses is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v. Nuccie 57 N.Y.2d 818, 819, 455 N.Y.S.2d 593, 441 N.E.2d 1111), and, in any event, not persuasive in view of defense summation comments attacking one prosecutor witness for having a motive to lie and accusing the police of having conspired to frame defendant (see, People v. Emphram, 179 A.D.2d 402, 403, 579 N.Y.S.2d 6, lv. denied 79 N.Y.2d 947, 583 N.Y.S.2d 201, 592 N.E.2d 809).

CARRO, J.P., and KUPFERMAN, ASCH, NARDELLI and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Lappard
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 16, 1995
    ...application to discharge his assigned counsel was properly denied for failure to show good cause for a substitution (People v. Robinson, 203 A.D.2d 165, 610 N.Y.S.2d 789, lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 971, 616 N.Y.S.2d 24, 639 N.E.2d 764). Defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial by th......
  • People v. Colon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 21, 1994
  • People v. Robinson
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1994

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT