People v. Rodriguez
Decision Date | 03 May 2004 |
Docket Number | 2002-04342. |
Citation | 2004 NY Slip Op 03596,776 N.Y.S.2d 79,7 A.D.3d 545 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the convictions of murder in the second degree, vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant correctly contends that his two convictions of murder in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 125.25 (1) and (3), respectively, were lesser-included offenses, and hence inclusory concurrent counts, of his conviction of murder in the first degree pursuant to Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [vii] (see CPL 300.30 [4]). "When it is impossible to commit a particular crime without concomitantly committing, by the same conduct, another offense of lesser grade or degree, the latter is, with respect to the former, a `lesser included offense'" (CPL 1.20 [37]; see People v Biggs, 1 NY3d 225, 230 [2003]; People v Baglieri, 51 AD2d 587, 588 [1976]). It is impossible to violate Penal Law § 125.27 (1) (a) (vii) without also violating Penal Law § 125.25 (1) and (3) (see People v Hildreth, 279 AD2d 791, 793 [2001]; see generally People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 63-64 [1982]).
Moreover, contrary to the People's argument, murder in the second degree is a crime of lesser "degree" than murder in the first degree because it "is a lower level of the same general crime classified by statute in degrees of seriousness," and is distinguished from murder in the first degree only because of "the presence of additional elements" in the definition of the latter (People v Wolf, 59 AD2d 547 [1977] ; see People v Hildreth, supra; see also People v Flores, 42 AD2d 431, 434 [1973]). Murder in the second degree is also a crime of lesser "grade" than murder in the first degree because it is subject to a lesser penalty (see People v Diaz, 65 AD2d 929 [1978]; People v Flores, supra; Penal Law §§ 60.06, 70.00 [3] [a] [i]; [5]; CPL 400.27 [1]).
Because a conviction on...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Miller
...the two second degree murder counts as inclusory concurrent counts of the first degree murder count and otherwise affirmed (7 A.D.3d 545, 776 N.Y.S.2d 79 [2004]). The People appeal the dismissal of the two second degree murder counts. We affirm. People v. Miller Defendant Miller accosted a ......
-
People v. Brown
...253 ; People v. Wilson , 121 A.D.3d 923, 994 N.Y.S.2d 379 ; People v. Villafane , 48 A.D.3d 712, 852 N.Y.S.2d 301 ; People v. Rodriguez , 7 A.D.3d 545, 776 N.Y.S.2d 79, affd 6 N.Y.3d 295, 812 N.Y.S.2d 20, 845 N.E.2d 451 ).The sentences imposed on the convictions of murder in the first degre......
-
People v. Rodriguez
...State of New York, Appellant, v. Christopher RODRIGUEZ, Respondent. Court of Appeals of New York. April 28, 2005. Reported below, 7 A.D.3d 545, 776 N.Y.S.2d 79. Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fahey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, N.......