People v. Rodriguez

• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
• Citation: People v. Rodriguez, 2016 NY Slip Op 6656, 143 A.D.3d 497, 39 N.Y.S.3d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
• Decision Date: 11 October 2016
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edy RODRIGUEZ, Defendant–Appellant.

143 A.D.3d 497

39 N.Y.S.3d 416

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 06656

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,

v.Edy RODRIGUEZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Oct. 11, 2016.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Kerry Elgarten of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Andrew J. Zapata of counsel), for respondent.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, ACOSTA, MOSKOWITZ, GESMER, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. Newman, J.), rendered July 18, 2010, as amended August 19, 2010 and November 18, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 25 years and 15 years, respectively, unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

As in People v. Velez , 131 A.D.3d 129, 13 N.Y.S.3d 354 (1st Dept.2015), reversal in the interest of justice is warranted by the court's failure to convey to the jury, directly or indirectly, in any part of its charge, that an acquittal on the top counts, regarding the respective victims, of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree based on a finding of justification would preclude consideration of the lesser manslaughter and assault charges. While the jury may have acquitted on the top charge without relying on defendant's justification defense in connection with one or both victims, it is nevertheless “impossible to discern whether acquittal of the top count ... was based on the jurors' finding of justification so as to mandate acquittal on...