People v. Rubicco
| Decision Date | 02 July 1973 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. George RUBICCO and August Rubicco, Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and MUNDER, SHAPIRO, GULOTTA and CHRIST, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendants from two judgments (one as to each defendant) of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered May 5, 1971, convicting them of possession of gambling records in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing them to a one-year penitentiary term.
Judgments reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The facts upon which the judgments are based have been considered and determined to have been established.
Upon the Voir dire conducted pursuant to former 22 NYCRR § 20.13, the trial court denied defendants an examination of prospective jurors concerning prejudice against persons of Italian origin, saying, Reversible constitutional error was thus committed, for an ethnic bias, often as invidious as a religious or racial bias, is a particular challenge for cause which would disqualify a juror from serving in the case (Code Crim.Proc. §§ 374, 376; People v. Leonti, 262 N.Y. 256, 186 N.E. 693; cf. Ham v. South Carolina, 409 U.S. 524, 93 S.Ct. 848, 35 L.Ed.2d 46). Reversible error was committed, too, by the trial court's limitation of defendants' cross-examination of the People's expert witness concerning his computation of the number of policy plays represented on the paper allegedly found in defendants' possession.
In the absence of the latter errors, we would modify the judgments by reducing the offense of which defendants were convicted to possession of gambling records in the second degree (Penal Law, § 225.15), because, in our opinion, a number played in a policy scheme as a combination number represents but one play or chance. Though it was unjustifiable for the trial court to have kept from defendants a copy of the paper to which the indictment refers until the direct examination of the People's expert witness, defendants were not substantially prejudiced by that error, for, as defendants' expert witness testified, the 'slip looks the same to me as it looked 20 years ago.'
Though neither side has directed our attention to it, our examination of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ross v. Ristaino, 74-1222
... ... '2. You have no prejudice against negroes? Against black people? You would not be infuenced by the use of the term 'black'? ' 409 U.S. at 525 n. 2, 93 S.Ct. at 849 ... 4 If a juror were prone to racial bias, ... State, 506 S.W.2d 60 (Mo.Ct.App.1974) (dictum); People v. Rubicco, 42 A.D.2d 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624 (2d Dept. 1973), aff'd on another ground, 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62, 316 N.E.2d 344 (1974) (possession of ... ...
-
Com. v. Lumley
...(1974). In a recent New York case a defendant of Italian ancestry made a similar motion. People v. Rubicco, 42 A.D.2d (N.Y.) 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624 (1973), affd., 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62, 314 N.E.2d 344 (1974).i. Mass.Adv.Sh. (1972) 1817, 1822.j. Mass.Adv.Sh. (1973) 849, 850.k. Mass.A......
-
People v. Rentz
...93 S.Ct. 848, 35 L.Ed.2d 46 (1973), People v. Williams, 41 A.D.2d 611, 340 N.Y.S.2d 504 (1st Dept.1973), and People v. Rubicco, 42 A.D.2d 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624 (2d Dept.1973), aff'd 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62, 316 N.E.2d 344 (1974). (3) Finally, as to both statutory and constitutional c......
-
People v. Blyden
...verdict based only upon it, they would support a challenge for cause (see People v. Leonti, 262 N.Y. 256, 186 N.E. 693; People v. Rubicco, 42 A.D.2d 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624, affd. 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62, 316 N.E.2d 344; People v. Presley, 22 A.D.2d 151, 254 N.Y.S.2d 400, affd. 16 N.Y.......
-
Jury selection
...inappropriately approached defense counsel, counsel should have been permitted to inquire concerning possible bias); People v. Rubicco , 42 A.D.2d 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624, aff’d 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62 (1974) (trial court’s refusal to permit defense counsel to examine prospective juror......
-
Table of cases
...Dept. 2005), §§ 5:85, 5:200 People v. Rozanski, 209 A.D.2d 1018, 619 N.Y.S.2d 441 (4th Dept. 1994), §§ 15:10, 15:70 People v. Rubicco, 42 A.D.2d 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624, aff’d 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62 (1974), § 2:140 People v. Rufrano , 220 A.D.2d 701, 632 N.Y.S.2d 648 (2d Dept. 1995), ......
-
Jury selection
...inappropriately approached defense counsel, counsel should have been permitted to inquire concerning possible bias); People v. Rubicco , 42 A.D.2d 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624, af ’d 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62 (1974) (trial court’s refusal to permit defense counsel to examine prospective juror......
-
Jury selection
...inappropriately approached defense counsel, counsel should have been permitted to inquire concerning possible bias); People v. Rubicco , 42 A.D.2d 719, 345 N.Y.S.2d 624, af ’d 34 N.Y.2d 841, 359 N.Y.S.2d 62 (1974) (trial court’s refusal to permit defense counsel to examine prospective juror......