People v. Salmon

Decision Date05 July 2012
Citation97 A.D.3d 608,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 05445,947 N.Y.S.2d 335
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rackish SALMON, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

97 A.D.3d 608
947 N.Y.S.2d 335
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 05445

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Rackish SALMON, appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

July 5, 2012.


Terry D. Horner, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., for appellant.

[97 A.D.3d 608]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered April 22, 2010, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the deportation consequences of his plea of guilty ( see Padilla v. Kentucky, 599 U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284). Since the record does not conclusively demonstrate that the defendant's counsel failed to inform the defendant of the [97 A.D.3d 609]deportation consequences of his plea, the defendant's claim cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, and the claim, thus, cannot be reviewed on direct appeal ( see People v. Freeman, 93 A.D.3d 805, 806, 940 N.Y.S.2d 314;People v. Romero, 82 A.D.3d 1013, 918 N.Y.S.2d 730;People v. Griffith, 78 A.D.3d 1194, 1196, 913 N.Y.S.2d 264).

RIVERA, J.P., ENG, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Drammeh
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 Noviembre 2012
    ...forum for reviewing the defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim in its entirety ( see People v. Salmon, 97 A.D.3d 608, 609, 947 N.Y.S.2d 335;see also People v. Haffiz, 19 N.Y.3d 883, 885, 951 N.Y.S.2d 690, 976 N.E.2d 216;People v. Crooks, 98 A.D.3d 630, 949 N.Y.S.2d 651;People v......
  • Edwards v. Wells
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 5 Julio 2012
    ...A.D.3d 530947 N.Y.S.2d 3352012 N.Y. Slip Op. 05387Michael EDWARDS, appellant,v.Marvin WELLS, respondent.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.July 5, Wittenstein & Associates, P.C. (Stephen D. Chakwin, Jr., New York, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant. [97 A.D.3d 530]......
  • Westchester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Robert D. (In re Robert Jordan G.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 5 Julio 2012
    ...approved his conditional surrender of the subject child because that portion of the order was entered upon his consent ( seeCPLR 5511; [947 N.Y.S.2d 335]Matter of Enasysia Tylesha R. [ April Deann R.], 83 A.D.3d 946, 947, 920 N.Y.S.2d 712), which we have concluded was validly obtained. Acco......
  • People v. Morrison
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 5 Julio 2012

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT