People v. Sardo

Decision Date20 October 1958
Citation15 Misc.2d 69,178 N.Y.S.2d 691
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York v. Fred SARDO, Defendant-Petitioner.
CourtNew York County Court

Fred Sardo, pro se. for the Petition.

Harry L. Rosenthal, Dist. Atty. of Monroe County, Rochester, opposed.

GEORGE D. OGDEN, Judge.

Defendant, Fred Sardo, and two others were convicted by a jury in Monroe County Court and sentenced May 4, 1938 to indeterminate terms in State's Prison at Attica, New York, the maximum of which, in defendant's case, was thirty years. Defendant and the others convicted with him appealed their convictions, which were affirmed by the Court of Appeals in 1942 in People v. Sardo, 288 N.Y. 507, 41 N.E.2d 924. Defendant sometime thereafter instituted a Habeas Corpus proceeding, the denial of the writ in which was affirmed by the Appellate Division in People ex rel. Sardo v. Jackson, 6 A.D.2d 938, 175 N.Y.S.2d 637. In that Habeas Corpus proceeding petitioner claimed that the indictment under which he was tried was improperly transferred to Monroe County Court. During the trial in 1938 defendant was represented by Israel Jacobs, Esq., an attorney duly admitted to practice by the courts of Connecticut, but not admitted to practice by the courts of New York. Defendant, upon his arraignment pursuant to the indictment returned against him, answered that Israel Jacobs appeared for him as his attorney. At the trial Mr. Fowler (Ray F. presented to the Court Mr. Jacobs, 'a member of the Connecticut Bar, and ask permission for him to act in this case for Mr. Sardo and Mr. Costello.' Upon the District Attorney's making no objection to this acting for Mr. Sardo in that trial, the Court allowed Mr. Jacobs to represent Mr. Sardo and the other defendant, who were present. Mr. Jacobs opened for the two defendants he represented; took part in the examination and cross-examination of the witnesses called; summed up for the defendant Sardo and the other defendant whom he represented; and, in other ways, by exceptions and objections, took part in the trial on behalf of the defendant Sardo. Mr. Jacobs moved for a new trial on behalf of the defendant Sardo, and was present at his sentencing. The above facts are contained in the record on appeal to the Court of Appeals (Fols. 1-1257), being No. 7979, March, 1942.

Defendant now claims that he was not represented by any counsel at the time of the trial resulting in his conviction in that (quoting from his petition) 'the Court permitted a person who was not admitted to practice law in this State, to represent petitioner, a fact and condition then unknown to petitioner, but either known by the Court, or neglected to be determined by it, thus depriving petitioner of adequate counsel for so serious a charge.'

This Court is unable, after diligent search, to find any statutes or reported decisions directly in point. In Finnerty v. Siegal, 168 Misc. 476, 5 N.Y.S.2d 309, 310, the Court says:

'Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiff's complaint in this action on a contract alleged to have been entered into by the parties for the rendition of professional services as an attorney, by plaintiff for defendant. Plaintiff is an attorney and counselor-at-law, admitted to practice in the highest courts of the States of Illinois and Minnesota, in the District of Columbia and in the Supreme Court of the United States. He is not admitted to practice in the State of New York.

'In a criminal trial pending before Mr. Justice McCook plaintiff obtained permission of said Justice to represent one Aladar Retek, business agent and organizer of defendant, who...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Irvin v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 10 Octubre 1967
    ...1 Cf. Lunce v. Overlade, 7 Cir., 244 F.2d 108, 74 A.L.R.2d 1384; United States v. Bradford, 2 Cir., 238 F.2d 395; People v. Sardo, 15 Misc.2d 69, 178 N.Y.S.2d 691; Hudspeth v. McDonald, 10 Cir., 120 F.2d 962; Abraham v. State, 228 Ind. 179, 91 N.E.2d 358.2 Thus we lay aside the Florida and ......
  • Widener v. State
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 19 Julio 1972
    ...as an attorney nor does it render petitioner's conviction void. See Berry v. Gray, Warden (Ky.), 299 S.W.2d 124; People v. Sardo, 15 Misc.2d 69, 178 N.Y.S.2d 691; and United States v. Bradford, 2 Cir., 238 F.2d 395.' (P. 408, 200 N.E.2d, p. The cases from other states have generally held th......
  • People v. Cornwall
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 22 Diciembre 1971
    ...251, 84 A.2d 459, cert. den. 342 U.S. 934, 72 S.Ct. 379, 96 N.Ed. 695; People v. Ragni, Co.Ct., 159 N.Y.S.2d 358; People v. Sardo, 15 Misc.2d 69, 178 N.Y.S.2d 691; and U.S. v. Bradford, 238 F.2d 395, cert. den. 352 U.S. 1002, 77 S.Ct. 558, 1 L.Ed.2d Wherein Mr. Justice Medina said 'The fail......
  • People v. Coyle
    • United States
    • New York Magistrate Court
    • 31 Marzo 1959
    ...only an issue of law for the Court to decide, no hearing is necessary. People v. Richetti, 302 N.Y. 290, 97 N.E.2d 908; People v. Sardo, 15 Misc.2d 69, 178 N.Y.S.2d 691. The minutes of the proceedings that took place at the time of defendant's arraignment disclose the The Court Officer havi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT