People v. Simmons
| Decision Date | 18 April 1977 |
| Citation | 90 Misc.2d 143,394 N.Y.S.2d 358 |
| Court | New York District Court |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York v. Thomas SIMMONS. |
Henry F. O'Brien, Dist. Atty., for People.
Robert T. Rinear, Jr., Legal Aid Atty., New York City, for defendant.
In this case, the Defendant was charged with the uninsured operation of a motor vehicle. The only evidence on this point was the officer's testimony that the Defendant operator failed to produce the insurance card when requested.
In order to establish that a nonowner operator is guilty of uninsured operation of a motor vehicle, it must be established both that the vehicle is uninsured and that the operator was aware of that fact (Vehicle & Traffic Law § 319 subd. 1). The burden of proving both lack of insurance and knowledge is upon the People (People v. Silver ; N.Y.L.J., 1/29/76; App. Term, Contra: People ex rel. Van Kluyve v. Omstadter, Sp.Sess., 213 N.Y.S.2d 882).
The People are aided in the presentation of their case by a presumption of uninsurance from the evidence of a failure to produce a valid insurance identification card upon request (Vehicle & Traffic Law § 319 subd. 3). However, this presumption goes only to the element of lack of insurance and not to knowledge upon the part of the nonowner operator.
To create a presumption of knowledge of uninsurance on a nonowner operator who fails to produce an insurance identification card, this Court would have to read into the statute a requirement that each operator inquire of the owner concerning insurance, and ask for the insurance card before he operates the vehicle. While the legislature could have imposed such an obligation, it has not done so and this Court is reluctant to do so in the light of judicial precedent (See: People v. Shapiro, 4 N.Y.2d 597, 176 N.Y.S.2d 632, 152 N.E.2d 65).
However, since the Defendant rested after the People's case without producing any evidence, if it were not for the foregoing interpretation of Section 319 of the Vehicle & Traffic Law, this Court would have found the Defendant guilty after trial.
Accordingly, the simplified traffic information is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Weinert
...October 25, 1993 [App. Term 2d & 11th Jud. Dists.]; see also, People v. Pender, 100 Misc.2d 846, 420 N.Y.S.2d 62; People v. Simmons, 90 Misc.2d 143, 394 N.Y.S.2d 358). Thus, the People failed to sustain their burden of proof for this Defendant next challenges the constitutionality of Vehicl......
-
People v. Scherbner
..."[t]he burden of proving both lack of insurance and knowledge [that the vehicle is uninsured] is upon the People." (People v Simmons, 90 Misc 2d 143, 144 [1977]; accord People v Pender, 100 Misc 2d 846 [1979].) As explained in Rose, New York Vehicle and Traffic Law (§ 19:4 at 205): "The Leg......
-
People v. Hakimi-Fard
...and the VTL does not require each non-owner operator to inquire of the owner concerning insurance coverage. (See People v. Simmons, 90 Misc.2d 143, 394 N.Y.S.2d 358. Also, see People v. Chin, supra.) There was no proof that the Defendant knew the vehicle was uninsured and, therefore, we fin......
-
People v. Evans
...or had knowledge that the owner lacked insurance, thus rendering the operation without insurance conviction defective"]; People v. Simmons , 90 Misc 2d 143 [Suffolk Dist Ct 1977] ; see also Carrieri, Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 62A, Vehicle and Traffic Law §......