People v. Smith
| Decision Date | 11 February 1982 |
| Citation | 55 N.Y.2d 945,449 N.Y.S.2d 177,434 N.E.2d 246 |
| Parties | , 434 N.E.2d 246 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Joseph SMITH, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 77 A.D.2d 636, 430 N.Y.S.2d 374, should be reversed and the case remitted to that court for consideration of the facts.
The role of independent proof to meet the requirements for corroboration under CPL 60.22 (subd. 1) is "to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime, not to prove he committed it" (People v. Hudson, 51 N.Y.2d 233, 238, 433 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 414 N.E.2d 385). For this purpose, matters which in themselves may be of seeming indifference may be "so harmonized ' "with the accomplice's narrative as to have a tendency to furnish the necessary connection between the defendant and the crime" ' (People v. Daniels, 37 N.Y.2d 624, 629, 376 N.Y.S.2d 436, 339 N.E.2d 139)" (People v. Cunningham, 48 N.Y.2d 938, 940, 425 N.Y.S.2d 59, 401 N.E.2d 182).
These principles in mind, we note that the independent witness Adams, who knew the defendant all her life, testified that, on the night of the homicide, upon looking in the direction from which she heard the shot, she at once saw "two guys over a man" and a third man walk away from where the body of the victim was lying. She also testified that there was then no one else around the body. She further testified that, without ever having looked away from the scene of the crime, she next noticed the men, including the third man, return and then recognized the latter as the defendant.
On this testimony, the trial court charged the jury, without exception: . On this charge, and taking the testimony of Adams most favorably to the People, as we must at this stage in view of the verdict of the jury (People v. Pena, 50 N.Y.2d 400, 407, 429 N.Y.S.2d 410, 406 N.E.2d 1347), it cannot be said that the corroboration was insufficient as a matter of law.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gaiter v. Lord
..."connect the defendant with the commission of the crime to be proven, not to prove she committed it." People v. Smith, 55 N.Y.2d 945, 946, 434 N.E.2d 246, 246, 449 N.Y.S.2d 177, 177 (1982); Steinberg, supra, 79 N.Y.2d at 683, 595 N.E.2d at 849, 584 N.Y.S.2d at 774; Hudson, supra, 51 N.Y.2d ......
-
People v. Konigsberg
... ... Nevertheless, measured by the foregoing criteria, we are of the view that there was sufficient corroboration of Salvatore Sinno's testimony to sustain the conviction. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Smith, 55 N.Y.2d 945, 947, 449 N.Y.S.2d ... 177, 434 N.E.2d 246), John Nadratowski's testimony provides a sufficient basis for the jury to evaluate Sinno's veracity. The account of a farmer happening upon the conspirator's automobile, the sounds of shoveling as they dug a grave, the license plate ... ...
-
People v. Ardito
...criminal transaction". (People v. Hudson, 51 N.Y.2d 233, 239, 433 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 414 N.E.2d 385; see also People v. Smith, 55 N.Y.2d 945, 449 N.Y.S.2d 177, 434 N.E.2d 246 (1982); People v. Daniels, 37 N.Y.2d 624, 376 N.Y.S.2d 436, 339 N.E.2d The required corroboration may be direct or circu......
-
People v. Potenza
...v. Morhouse, 21 N.Y.2d 66, 75, 286 N.Y.S.2d 657, 233 N.E.2d 705, supra, citing People v. Mullens, supra; see People v. Smith, 55 N.Y.2d 945, 946, 449 N.Y.S.2d 177, 434 N.E.2d 246; People v. Daniels, 37 N.Y.2d 624, 630, 376 N.Y.S.2d 436, 339 N.E.2d 139; People v. Kohut, 30 N.Y.2d 183, 193-19......