People v. Snyder

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationPeople v. Snyder, 29 AD3d 310, 813 N.Y.S.2d 433, 2006 NY Slip Op 3457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Decision Date02 May 2006
Docket Number7932.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY SNYDER, Appellant.

The court was not obligated, sua sponte, to order a CPL article 730 examination (see Pate v Robinson, 383 US 375 [1966]; People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757 [1999], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]; People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878 [1995]). The court was familiar with defendant after observing him during...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • People v. Miller
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 9, 2011
    ...the proceedings and to assist in his own defense ( see e.g. People v. Monk, 29 A.D.3d 605, 815 N.Y.S.2d 130 [2006]; People v. Snyder, 29 A.D.3d 310, 813 N.Y.S.2d 433 [2006]; People v. Soto, 23 A.D.3d 586, 806 N.Y.S.2d 612 [2005] ). Defendant's responses to questioning, if occasionally argum......
  • People v. Breckenridge
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 7, 2018
    ...unreliable indicator of his present competency. Defendant's "questionable decisions" as to trial strategy ( People v. Snyder , 29 A.D.3d 310, 310, 813 N.Y.S.2d 433 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 7 N.Y.3d 818, 822 N.Y.S.2d 493, 855 N.E.2d 809 [2006] ), such as presenting inconsistent defenses a......
  • People v. Musaid
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 17, 2019
    ...provided "no indication that [he] was unable to understand the proceedings and assist in his defense" ( People v. Snyder, 29 A.D.3d 310, 310, 813 N.Y.S.2d 433 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 7 N.Y.3d 818, 822 N.Y.S.2d 493, 855 N.E.2d 809 [2006] ). Although defendant engaged in some conspiratori......
  • People v. Snyder
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 25, 2006
    ...N.E.2d 809 7 N.Y.3d 818 PEOPLE v. SNYDER. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. August 25, 2006. Appeal from 1st Dept.: 29 A.D.3d 310, 813 N.Y.S.2d 433 Application for leave to criminal appeal Denied. (Read, J.). ...
  • Get Started for Free