People v. Stevenson
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | The Supreme Court, Criminal Term, Kings County, Hyman Barshay |
| Citation | People v. Stevenson, 17 N.Y.2d 682, 269 N.Y.S.2d 458, 216 N.E.2d 615 (N.Y. 1966) |
| Decision Date | 31 March 1966 |
| Parties | , 216 N.E.2d 615 The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. John STEVENSON, Appellant. |
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 23 A.D.2d 472, 262 N.Y.S.2d 238.
Aaron E. Koota, Brooklyn (Harold M. Brown, Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondents.
Defendant was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of second degree manslaughter.
The Supreme Court, Criminal Term, Kings County, Hyman Barshay, J., entered a judgment, and the defendant appealed.
The Appellate Division entered a judgment affirming judgment of the Criminal Term and held that defendant, who was born on August 25, 1947, was 16 years of age on August 24, 1963 on date of homicide, and was not entitled to removal of prosecution to Family Court as a juvenile offender on ground that he was under the age of 16 years at the time of the homicide. Christ, J., dissented, on ground that Section 712 of the Family Court Act which provides that a juvenile delinquent means a person over seven and less than 16 years of agemeans that birth date itself shall control and not some artificial arrangement resulting in the day before the birth date.
The defendant appealed to the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Harris, In re
...537 A.2d 696; State v. Alley, supra, 594 S.W.2d 381; United States v. Tucker (D.C.App.1979) 407 A.2d 1067; People v. Stevenson (1966) 17 N.Y.2d 682, 269 N.Y.S.2d 458, 216 N.E.2d 615; Bynum v. Moore (1923) 101 Okl. 128, 223 P. 687.) The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently joined this group. ......
-
People v. Woolfolk
...age at which the district court gains jurisdiction over people charged with committing criminal acts”); People v. Stevenson, 17 N.Y.2d 682, 683, 269 N.Y.S.2d 458, 216 N.E.2d 615 (1966) (adopting the reasoning of the dissent in People v. Stevenson, 23 A.D.2d 472, 476, 262 N.Y.S.2d 238 (1965)......
-
Mason v. Board of Education
...at 1070. The origin of this line of opinions, what amount to an exception to the exception, is the case of People v. Stevenson, 17 N.Y.2d 682, 269 N.Y.S.2d 458, 216 N.E.2d 615 (1966). In Stevenson, the New York Court of Appeals, reversing an intermediate appellate court decision, adopted th......
-
People v. Williams
...the age of a defendant goes to the jurisdiction, * they do not discuss the type of jurisdiction at issue (see, People v. Stevenson, 17 N.Y.2d 682, 269 N.Y.S.2d 458, 216 N.E.2d 615 [reversed for reasons stated in dissent at Appellate Division, 23 A.D.2d 472, 476, 262 N.Y.S.2d 238]; People v.......