People v. Sullivan

Decision Date23 June 1986
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. John T. SULLIVAN, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Michael O'Brien and Emil S. Bricker, Kew Gardens, of counsel), for appellant. Mahler & Harris, P.C., Kew Gardens (Stephen R. Mahler, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), dated August 6, 1985, 129 Misc.2d 747, 493 N.Y.S.2d 932, which granted the defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence. Order affirmed. The statutes upon which the People rely to justify the warrantless search of the defendant's premises (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 415-a; New York City Charter § 436) have been declared unconstitutional (see, People v. Burger, 67 N.Y.2d 338, 502 N.Y.S.2d 702, 493 N.E.2d 926). There being no other basis for upholding the validity of the search, the order must be affirmed.

BRACKEN, J.P., and BROWN, WEINSTEIN and SPATT, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Keta
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • February 21, 1989
    ...909 and an earlier decision rendered by this court in People v. Sullivan, 129 Misc.2d 747, 493 N.Y.S.2d 932 [1985], affd. 121 A.D.2d 663, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1009 [1986]. VTL § 415-a(5)(a) relied upon states in pertinent "Any records required by this section shall apply only to vehicles or parts o......
  • People v. Torres
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 23, 1986
    ......Underwood, Robin Bernstein and Seth M. Lieberman, of counsel), for respondent.         Before GIBBONS, J.P., and BROWN, WEINSTEIN and KOOPER, JJ.         MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.         Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), rendered March 2, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.         Judgment affirmed.         The defendant seeks a reversal of his conviction on the ground that he was denied a fair trial due to ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT