People v. Tennyson
| Decision Date | 25 May 1967 |
| Parties | , 227 N.E.2d 876 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl TENNYSON, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Michael Stella, for appellant.
Leonard Rubenfeld, Dist. Atty. (Jerome K. Carver, of counsel), for respondent.
In the early hours of a Summer morning in 1963, a couple, sitting in the front seat of a parked automobile in New Rochelle, were abruptly interrupted by the defendant who opened the front door of the vehicle, shined a light inside and ordered the male occupant out of the car. When the latter did not move, the defendant threatened him with a knife. Just at that moment, another car came along and the defendant ran away. The victim flagged down the passing automobile, which turned out to be a police car, and shortly thereafter the defendant was arrested. He was charged with assault in the third degree in an information sworn to by the arresting officer on the basis of 'conversations had' with the victim. Convicted of the misdemeanor after a trial, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and a fine of $500 (Penal Law, Consol.Laws, c. 40, § 245) plus imprisonment, up to an additional year, computed on the basis of one day for each dollar of the fine that was not not paid (Code Crim.Pro., §§ 488, 718).
Reasonably read, the information sworn to by the police officer sufficiently sets forth the sources of his knowledge, as well as the grounds for his belief, that the defendant had committed a crime. The specific statement by the officer-affiant that he had talked with the victim of the assault significantly distinguishes the present case from People v. Jeffries (19 N.Y.2d 564, 281 N.Y.S.2d 67, 277 N.E.2d 870), where the affiant simply made vague references to conversations 'between' a patrolman and three other individuals, not the slightest indication being given as to the contents of such conversations or as to the facts communicated. As we pointed out, the 'undescribed talk could be quite irrelevant'. (People v. Jeffries, supra, p. 567, 281 N.Y.S.2d p. 70, 277 N.E.2d p. 872).
For this reason, it is preferable, if not essential, for any information based on hearsay to recite the substance of what the affiant was told. However, the failure to do so here is not fatal. The source of the hearsay was the very victim of the assault and the Only possible inference is that, during the conversation described, the defendant was accused of having committed the crime. If such were not the case, and the victim had actually not accused the defendant at all, then, the affiant's reference to his conversation with the victim would amount to deception under oath and furnish basis for a perjury prosecution. This meets the test that the bringing of criminal proceedings be supported by sworn testimony 'subject to the penalty for perjury if willfully false'. (People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N.Y. 383, 391, 79 N.E. 330, 333, 10...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Antazo, In re
... ... , the Sheriff of Santa Clara County, although the return to the order to show cause appears to have been by both the respondent and the People. Hereafter we shall refer to respondent in the singular ... 4 We will use the language of the statute (§ 1205) although petitioner was confined ... Mackey (1966) 18 N.Y.2d 755, 274 N.Y.S.2d 682, 221 N.E.2d 462; People v. Tennyson (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 573, 281 N.Y.S.2d 76, 227 N.E.2d 876; People v. Collins (1965) 47 Misc.2d 210, 261 N.Y.S.2d 970; People ex rel. Loos v. Redman ... ...
-
United States v. Tortorello
... ... " People v. Ricken, 29 A.D.2d 192, 287 N.Y.S.2d 118 (3d Dept. 1968), aff'd, 27 N.Y.2d 923, 318 N.Y.S.2d 142, 266 N.E.2d 821 (1970), held that "the use of the ... 933 (1918), cf., Sherrick v. Eyman, 389 F.2d 648 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 874, 89 S.Ct. 167, 21 L.Ed.2d 144 (1969); People v. Tennyson, 19 N.Y.2d 573, 576, 281 N.Y.S.2d 76, 227 N.E.2d 876 (1967). But cf. Rose v. United States, 45 F.2d 459, 464 (8th Cir. 1930). Clearly, this ... ...
-
People v. Jones
... ... J.); State v. Zornes, 78 Wash.2d 9, 24--25, 475 P.2d 109; State v. Pirkey, 203 Or. 697, 702--704, 281 P.2d 698; 16 A C.J.S. Constitutional Law § 564, at pp. 529--530; cf. Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 243, 90 S.Ct. 2018, 26 L.Ed.2d 586; People v. Tennyson, 19 N.Y.2d 573, 576, 281 N.Y.S.2d 76, 227 N.E.2d 876; People v. Saffore, 18 N.Y.2d 101, 104, 271 N.Y.S.2d 972, 974, 218 N.E.2d 686, 687; People v. Gilbert, 72 Misc.2d 795, 799, 339 N.Y.S.2d 743, 748 (Kreindler, J.); People v. Turville, 51 Cal.2d 620, 638, 335 P.2d 678, cert. den. 360 U.S. 939, 79 ... ...
-
State v. Allen
... ... Defendant relied upon People v. Collins, 47 Misc.2d 210, 261 N.Y.S.2d 970 (Cty.Ct.1965). Defendant therein was convicted of assault in the third degree and sentenced to the ... Mackey, 18 N.Y.2d 755, 274 N.Y.S.2d 682, 221 N.E.2d 462 (Ct.App.1966), and People v. Tennyson, 19 N.Y.2d 573, 281 N.Y.S.2d 76, 227 N.E.2d 876 (Ct.App.1967), holding the portion of the sentence, which required defendant to serve out the unpaid ... ...